That's not how you spell interest.
oly: Unless you're talking to Stripe, in which case it could be. It's hard to say.If you'd written "boing!" that would have been funny...and surprising. So you could have had two firsts for you in one go.
The long nightmare has just begun: Inauguration of a fraud.
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
oly: Unless you're talking to Stripe, in which case it could be. It's hard to say.I know exactly what you mean, TH seems to have lost his grip on his mediocre persona. I actually sympathize with his present predicament. It's a shame he refuses to take any suggestions and clings to his, less than adequate discernment. Well, you can try leading a Liberal to logic and reason, but, can't make them stop protesting and rioting.
Someday TH will see himself for what he never was and seek to accept himself for what he isn't.
I fear that TH will someday pat himself on the back so many times that, he'll develop a blood clot in his shoulder area.
TH was so threatened by my comments that he had me locked out of his Cervantes thread. Oh the irony.
No, you got you locked out for trolling. I've seen toddlers that are scarier...and more interesting to talk to.TH was so threatened by my comments that he had me locked out of his Cervantes thread. Oh the irony.
lain:TH was so threatened by my comments that he had me locked out of his Cervantes thread. Oh the irony.
Yeah, he frightens easily. It's a Liberal thing.
If you could be this funny when you meant to be I'd spend most of my time here reading you.
At what point did you go from making an attempt to be funny to just making things up and sounding bitter?
Because it's that hard to tell.
lain:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Putin-linked think tank drew up plan to sway 2016 U.S. election - documents
A Russian government think tank controlled by Vladimir Putin developed a plan to swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine voters’ faith in the American electoral system, three current and four former U.S. officials told Reuters.
They described two confidential documents from the think tank as providing the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election. U.S. intelligence officials acquired the documents, which were prepared by the Moscow-based Russian Institute for Strategic Studies [en.riss.ru/], after the election.
The institute is run by retired senior Russian foreign intelligence officials appointed by Putin’s office.
The first Russian institute document was a strategy paper written last June that circulated at the highest levels of the Russian government but was not addressed to any specific individuals.
It recommended the Kremlin launch a propaganda campaign on social media and Russian state-backed global news outlets to encourage U.S. voters to elect a president who would take a softer line toward Russia than the administration of then-President Barack Obama, the seven officials said.
A second institute document, drafted in October and distributed in the same way, warned that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was likely to win the election. For that reason, it argued, it was better for Russia to end its pro-Trump propaganda and instead intensify its messaging about voter fraud to undermine the U.S. electoral system’s legitimacy and damage Clinton’s reputation in an effort to undermine her presidency, the seven officials said.
The current and former U.S. officials spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the Russian documents’ classified status. They declined to discuss how the United States obtained them. U.S. intelligence agencies also declined to comment on them.
Putin has denied interfering in the U.S. election. Putin’s spokesman and the Russian institute did not respond to requests for comment.
The documents were central to the Obama administration's conclusion that Russia mounted a “fake news” campaign and launched cyber attacks against Democratic Party groups and Clinton's campaign, the current and former officials said.
They described two confidential documents from the think tank as providing the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election. U.S. intelligence officials acquired the documents, which were prepared by the Moscow-based Russian Institute for Strategic Studies [en.riss.ru/], after the election.
The institute is run by retired senior Russian foreign intelligence officials appointed by Putin’s office.
The first Russian institute document was a strategy paper written last June that circulated at the highest levels of the Russian government but was not addressed to any specific individuals.
It recommended the Kremlin launch a propaganda campaign on social media and Russian state-backed global news outlets to encourage U.S. voters to elect a president who would take a softer line toward Russia than the administration of then-President Barack Obama, the seven officials said.
A second institute document, drafted in October and distributed in the same way, warned that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was likely to win the election. For that reason, it argued, it was better for Russia to end its pro-Trump propaganda and instead intensify its messaging about voter fraud to undermine the U.S. electoral system’s legitimacy and damage Clinton’s reputation in an effort to undermine her presidency, the seven officials said.
The current and former U.S. officials spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the Russian documents’ classified status. They declined to discuss how the United States obtained them. U.S. intelligence agencies also declined to comment on them.
Putin has denied interfering in the U.S. election. Putin’s spokesman and the Russian institute did not respond to requests for comment.
The documents were central to the Obama administration's conclusion that Russia mounted a “fake news” campaign and launched cyber attacks against Democratic Party groups and Clinton's campaign, the current and former officials said.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Putin-linked think tank drew up plan to sway 2016 U.S. election - documents
The Russia connection is the elephant in the oval office.
A Russian government think tank controlled by Vladimir Putin developed a plan to swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine voters’ faith in the American electoral system, three current and four former U.S. officials told Reuters.
They described two confidential documents from the think tank as providing the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election. U.S. intelligence officials acquired the documents, which were prepared by the Moscow-based Russian Institute for Strategic Studies [en.riss.ru/], after the election.
The institute is run by retired senior Russian foreign intelligence officials appointed by Putin’s office.
The first Russian institute document was a strategy paper written last June that circulated at the highest levels of the Russian government but was not addressed to any specific individuals.
It recommended the Kremlin launch a propaganda campaign on social media and Russian state-backed global news outlets to encourage U.S. voters to elect a president who would take a softer line toward Russia than the administration of then-President Barack Obama, the seven officials said.
A second institute document, drafted in October and distributed in the same way, warned that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was likely to win the election. For that reason, it argued, it was better for Russia to end its pro-Trump propaganda and instead intensify its messaging about voter fraud to undermine the U.S. electoral system’s legitimacy and damage Clinton’s reputation in an effort to undermine her presidency, the seven officials said.
The current and former U.S. officials spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the Russian documents’ classified status. They declined to discuss how the United States obtained them. U.S. intelligence agencies also declined to comment on them.
Putin has denied interfering in the U.S. election. Putin’s spokesman and the Russian institute did not respond to requests for comment.
The documents were central to the Obama administration's conclusion that Russia mounted a “fake news” campaign and launched cyber attacks against Democratic Party groups and Clinton's campaign, the current and former officials said.
They described two confidential documents from the think tank as providing the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election. U.S. intelligence officials acquired the documents, which were prepared by the Moscow-based Russian Institute for Strategic Studies [en.riss.ru/], after the election.
The institute is run by retired senior Russian foreign intelligence officials appointed by Putin’s office.
The first Russian institute document was a strategy paper written last June that circulated at the highest levels of the Russian government but was not addressed to any specific individuals.
It recommended the Kremlin launch a propaganda campaign on social media and Russian state-backed global news outlets to encourage U.S. voters to elect a president who would take a softer line toward Russia than the administration of then-President Barack Obama, the seven officials said.
A second institute document, drafted in October and distributed in the same way, warned that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was likely to win the election. For that reason, it argued, it was better for Russia to end its pro-Trump propaganda and instead intensify its messaging about voter fraud to undermine the U.S. electoral system’s legitimacy and damage Clinton’s reputation in an effort to undermine her presidency, the seven officials said.
The current and former U.S. officials spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the Russian documents’ classified status. They declined to discuss how the United States obtained them. U.S. intelligence agencies also declined to comment on them.
Putin has denied interfering in the U.S. election. Putin’s spokesman and the Russian institute did not respond to requests for comment.
The documents were central to the Obama administration's conclusion that Russia mounted a “fake news” campaign and launched cyber attacks against Democratic Party groups and Clinton's campaign, the current and former officials said.
The Russia connection is the elephant in the oval office.
At what point did you go from making an attempt to be funny to just making things up and sounding bitter?
Because it's that hard to tell.
I succeed whereas, you falter in the area of humor. So far as being "bitter," not gonna happen. Your perception is WAY off.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Agreed, but I'd go farther. Here's an interesting analysis:
Racism motivated Trump voters more than authoritarianism
Everyone needs to keep praying for Trump and our country. Besides the Cuban missile crisis, this is the most dangerous time in U.S. history. Obama ignored North Korea for eight years and placed our country in "harms way." One might say: "Rome (The U.S.) burned while Nero (Obama) fiddled around with our countries economy, now at twenty Trillion dollars."
Had Hillary won the Presidency (God forbid) we would have had another four to eight years of Obama. That's really frightening. Look what damage the left-wing Liberals are doing in the Government and the streets of our Nation. It's disgusting. Maxine Waters only reason for taking another breath is to see that President Trump is Impeached. Schumer, Pelosi, and others are on the same page. They're all seeking to find Caesar (Trump) vulnerable so they can stab him in the back. The old "Eh, too, Brutus!" scenario. While the Liberals are stabbing their President in the back, they're doing the same to our Country.
At a time that we need to be united, the LIBS are waging a war against our Government and half of our population. Like I said, they're doing it from the inside of our leadership and on the streets.
At a time that we need to be united, the LIBS are waging a war against our Government and half of our population. Like I said, they're doing it from the inside of our leadership and on the streets.
Given the focus on immigrants and illegal aliens and the sort of rhetoric focused there I suppose it's to be expected, sadly.
One of the LIBS favorite "weapons of choice" is to play the racist, xenophobe, fascist, etc. cards. They use them like "Flash Cards."
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
The two things (right-wing authoritarianism) and racism correlate. I posted this elsewhere:
Ah, so The Donald did not campaign as a racist xenophobe. Missed that part.