expos4ever
Well-known member
Listen you-know-what-for-brains: Only a MAGA nutjob would call that pedophilia.That little girls breast to you are non sexual ? Are you a complete moron ?
already did check the thread.
Listen you-know-what-for-brains: Only a MAGA nutjob would call that pedophilia.That little girls breast to you are non sexual ? Are you a complete moron ?
already did check the thread.
I apologize for the tautology that is "MAGA nutjob".Listen you-know-what-for-brains: Only a MAGA nutjob would call that pedophilia.
Only a fellow pedo would justify pedo Joe touching that little girl you’ve exposed yourself.Listen you-know-what-for-brains: Only a MAGA nutjob would call that pedophilia.
Unbelievable that you are so left that you cannot see an old man groping a child and call it what it is.You need to come clean with us and stop your two-stepping: Are you suggesting that what we see in that video constitutes pedophilia? Yes or No.
Only a pedo would not call that pedophilla.Listen you-know-what-for-brains: Only a MAGA nutjob would call that pedophilia.
That little girls breast to you are non sexual ? Are you a complete moron ?
already did check the thread.
You call that groping? You really need to get out more.Unbelievable that you are so left that you cannot see an old man groping a child and call it what it is.
I can argue that if an ole pedo touched my daughter like that pervert touched that little girl I would break his jaws.A little girls breast area along with the rest of her are completely non sexual unless there's something wrong with you that you can 'argue' otherwise?
You libtards will justify any evil if one of your own is a pervert.You call that groping? You really need to get out more.
Didn't remotely address my post. Kinda figured you wouldn't...I can argue that if an ole pedo touched my daughter like that pervert touched that little girl I would break his jaws.
What you're really arguing is that the more common a sin becomes the more acceptable it is and the less harmful it is. That's been going on for a long time. You're not the first to imply that a common sin is not a sin just because it has become common.You call that groping? You really need to get out more.
A little girls breast area along with the rest of her are completely non sexual unless there's something wrong with you that you can 'argue' otherwise?
If he's willing to that when he knows that he's on camera, just imagine what he might be willing to do in private. Disgusting to the max.Intentionally touching a young girl's chest in a public setting is inappropriate, at best, and pedophilic at worst.
No, in no way whatsoever as should have been blatantly apparent already. Not interested.:vomit:
So you're actually defending pedophilia, now?
Intentionally touching a young girl's chest in a public setting is inappropriate, at best, and pedophilic at worst.
Even worse if it's done in such a way as to try to make it seem accidental or coincidental.
If he's willing to that when he knows that he's on camera, just imagine what he might be willing to do in private. Disgusting to the max.
It was addressed you need a reading comprehension course.Didn't remotely address my post. Kinda figured you wouldn't...
Him as in the pedophile who fondles young children ?Former Miss Arizona says Donald Trump used to 'stroll in' to see naked women in dressing room
Mr Trump said on Howard Stern’s radio show in 2005 that he could ‘get away’ with walking into the dressing room to ‘inspect’ beautiful womenwww.independent.co.uk
Nothing "creepy" about Trump at all though was there? Oh, well, just stuff like "Access Hollywood" and the like. Still, carry on reading stuff into public Biden photos. Says more about you and those who read sexual stuff into them than it does about him.
It's a good thing that you don't live in England. Male family friends and relatives can often be seen carrying, 'pick-a-backing', holding hands or cuddling children to them as they walk in parks or shopping centres here.Maybe you should re-read what exactly it is you just said, and how vile it sounds.
It sounds exactly how a pedophile would word it.
:vomit:
What a cheap nasty slanderous thing to suggest.Wrong ! The image you see when you look in a mirror is what pedo’s who stick together see when they look in a mirror.
So much for your idea of Unity.I prefer the truth.
There are no versions of the truth. Those would be lies.