Aren't you presuming he's not an alien himself?
I've pondered that possibility!
Aren't you presuming he's not an alien himself?
You mean before you were totally deceived by this huckster. He spreads the manure and you just ate it up. Putting out the front of being "Christ Like" or your opinion of what "Christ Like" is really means nothing being he brings you the message and spirit of anti-christ in his message. Wake up....
Gal. 1:8 But even though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you any gospel other than that which we preached to you, let him be cursed.
Gal. 1:9 As we have said before, so I now say again: if any man preaches to you any gospel other than that which you received, let him be cursed.
Aren't you presuming he's not an alien himself?
Wowzers... Even most churches are preaching another gospel.
For the denominationalists, it's a hope-only gospel with grace codified by the Law in varying degrees.
For the charismatics/pentecostals, it's either a hope-only gospel with grace codifed by the Law OR a hope-only gospel with grace codified by the gifts as works.
THIS is the work (singular) of God... that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent. -John 6:29
Freelight, have you ever been abducted by alien beings? This is a serious
question, please treat it as such! I have a hunch that you may have, not
only been abducted but have had many hours worth of earnest discussions
with those who did not originate on planet earth! I would be interested in
what these beings from another galaxy have disclosed to you in private?
You have the opportunity to share, what it was like to be aboard an alien
spacecraft, and mingling with creatures from another world! I'd also like
to know if you, and they communicated telepathically or otherwise? Did
you have an interesting relationship with them, and were they affable?
Did they question you about, life on earth? Did you find out what their life
expectancy was on their planet and what form of governmental format
they used? I have a myriad of other questions; however, I would prefer
if you added any other relevant details, you might deem
informative? Thanks in advance for your co-operation!
Oh I see you already speak klingon....:chuckle:
An escapee from area 51 I presume. :think:
They mocked the prophets in their day as well.
Was "Gabriel" from area 51?
Gabriel first appears, in the current OT books, to Daniel to help him interpret his "vision."
Gabriel appears in The Book of Enoch, along with new names of other celestials.
Gabriel appears in apocalyptic literature form the "Intertestamental period" in various apocalyptical works.
So, when this celestial being appears to Mary and Elizabeth, imagine if they had been as childish as those who claim to be followers of Gabriel’s master as you on this forum have been about this latest revelation of truth?
Why do you think God only existed in an enchanted age 2000 years ago? Why do you deride the thought of angels or celestials partaking in revelation in this age?
You do believe in Christ so why do you think he cannot tell you more in response to your faith?
Why do you think Freelight and I are here, is it because we like to take a lot of abuse for our own amusement?
“Woe upon you, false guides of a nation! Over yonder have you built a monument to the martyred prophets of old, while you plot to destroy Him of whom they spoke. You garnish the tombs of the righteous and flatter yourselves that, had you lived in the days of your fathers, you would not have killed the prophets; and then in the face of such self-righteous thinking you make ready to slay him of whom the prophets spoke, the Son of Man. Inasmuch as you do these things, are you witness to yourselves that you are the wicked sons of them who slew the prophets. Go on, then, and fill up the cup of your condemnation to the full!"
Some of you here savor of the spirit of the wicked sons of them who slew the prophets, in doing so, you sincerely think you are doing a service to God.
Caino
They mocked the prophets in their day as well.
Was "Gabriel" from area 51?
Gabriel first appears, in the current OT books, to Daniel to help him interpret his "vision."
Gabriel appears in The Book of Enoch, along with new names of other celestials.
Gabriel appears in apocalyptic literature form the "Intertestamental period" in various apocalyptical works.
So, when this celestial being appears to Mary and Elizabeth, imagine if they had been as childish as those who claim to be followers of Gabriel’s master as you on this forum have been about this latest revelation of truth?
Why do you think God only existed in an enchanted age 2000 years ago? Why do you deride the thought of angels or celestials partaking in revelation in this age?
You do believe in Christ so why do you think he cannot tell you more in response to your faith?
Why do you think Freelight and I are here, is it because we like to take a lot of abuse for our own amusement?
“Woe upon you, false guides of a nation! Over yonder have you built a monument to the martyred prophets of old, while you plot to destroy Him of whom they spoke. You garnish the tombs of the righteous and flatter yourselves that, had you lived in the days of your fathers, you would not have killed the prophets; and then in the face of such self-righteous thinking you make ready to slay him of whom the prophets spoke, the Son of Man. Inasmuch as you do these things, are you witness to yourselves that you are the wicked sons of them who slew the prophets. Go on, then, and fill up the cup of your condemnation to the full!"
Some of you here savor of the spirit of the wicked sons of them who slew the prophets, in doing so, you sincerely think you are doing a service to God.
Caino
One of the reasons you're here, is to debate! I don't really
believe you think you're going to change anyone's mind/heart
about their faith in Christianity! So, you most likely hope to
find posters who are, already interested in "new-age"
spiritualism or those who are sitting on the fence!
You'll find no one who is well versed in the Bible, and strong
in their faith, who'll suddenly, "see the light" and follow
what you and your ilk promote! Perhaps, you think I'm being,
'the master of the obvious' however, that's the way it is!
You mean before you were totally deceived by this huckster. He spreads the manure and you just ate it up. Putting out the front of being "Christ Like" or your opinion of what "Christ Like" is really means nothing being he brings you the message and spirit of anti-christ in his message. Wake up....
Gal. 1:8 But even though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you any gospel other than that which we preached to you, let him be cursed.
Gal. 1:9 As we have said before, so I now say again: if any man preaches to you any gospel other than that which you received, let him be cursed.
Yes, far beyond anyone's intellectual concept of theology or assumption of a 'faith-tradition', is a basic respect for an open-dialogue on religious or philosophical matters. This allows for a full spectrum of response-mechanisms, but hopefully one can use such 'ground' to foster a creative or productive dialogue, using the 'opportunity' to allow his own presentation to stand upon its own merit, which also includes the 'manner' in which such is presented, which reveals the 'spirit' in which it is shared. In this case, more care is given to responses, that they accord in a way that best represents the value and character of the composer and/or of his representation of 'God'. - this is a serious reflection to consider.
A demand for 'burden of proof' by one, automatically requires the demand for the 'same' by the demander. Its a 2-way street <---->
This puts the 'truth-smack' motif in a 'mirror-position' of like vulnerability, where all views are seriously inspected, and continually re-searched as needed. Knowledge is not something to fear, but to explore and discover, - it is also just as well to admit the 'unknowable' (agnosis), in one's life journey, since there is that which is beyond the 'known', ever residing potentially within the infinite.
pj
The fruit of the dialog shows the root stock it flows from, the trained response team just does what come comes naturally to them in their narrow world view. The concept of the biblical message was always pointing in-ward, which is the same message we can find in other traditions based on the same motif, the two brothers, or two wolves, two covenants, two mounts, etc...... with the third divine teacher speaking to the heart on which one to feed, if one had ears to hear.
What we need is a special section for people deceived by cults. Where we Christians can choose to interact or not. False teaching and leading people astray doesn't seem like the idea behind this forum, or am I wrong?
So you want a religious section with out the pricking, or spiritual discomfort? seems like your not to stable in your position if your worried about the power of your God's ability to use this section to prove your superior position to the world.
Using false teaching mantras as a shield is a cop out, and what about your cult? it should stand on it's own merit instead of resorting to high volume thumping of the chest with sitcom style heckling (my gods bigger than yours) that really isn't helping your position.