Good point John, thanks. We've all endured a world run by YE bible kooks.
Don't forget the "Urantia" kooks either!
Good point John, thanks. We've all endured a world run by YE bible kooks.
Hi GM,
If you want to engage the purpose of the thread and the forum for that matter 'intelligently', you'll first have to educate yourself on what the UB is....and follow the dialogue and responses from knowledgable persons here on the variety of subjects concerning the UB. The comical pot shots do not foster a useful dialogue here. I love sci-fi by the way - the stories and mythology represented in epics such as Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. do cover issues of morality, ethics, philosophy, stretching our consciousness towards the unknown, the vast reaches and potentials of infinity. However, the UB is different and includes more elements expanding upon a base of human knowledge opening our vision to a greater cosmic-comprehension and picture of the Universe, and our purpose in it.
I'd learn more by reading the funny papers! Sorry, I'm not sold
on your beliefs!
I'd learn more by reading the funny papers! Sorry, I'm not sold
on your beliefs!
As least nobody is trying to pass off the funny papers as inspired works...you know what they say "if you believe in nothing, you'll fall for anything".
Hi GM,
If you want to engage the purpose of the thread and the forum for that matter 'intelligently', you'll first have to educate yourself on what the UB is....and follow the dialogue and responses from knowledgable persons here on the variety of subjects concerning the UB. The comical pot shots do not foster a useful dialogue here. I love sci-fi by the way - the stories and mythology represented in epics such as Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. do cover issues of morality, ethics, philosophy, stretching our consciousness towards the unknown, the vast reaches and potentials of infinity. However, the UB is different and includes more elements expanding upon a base of human knowledge opening our vision to a greater cosmic-comprehension and picture of the Universe, and our purpose in it.
Grosnick Marowbe responds:
I'd learn more by reading the funny papers! Sorry, I'm not sold
on your beliefs!
7. Thou SHALL NOT troll our forums. If you are here to make outlandish, crazy statements merely to get a rise out of the membership and cause trouble, please save yourself the time and leave.
And yet so many still see it as some form of inspired work...please.
I wonder if they have conventions like the trekkies do? :chuckle:
LOL! Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was a life long Urantia Book reader, some of his ideas for the series came from the book. But it's understandable that people who believe the Jews story about themselves would be a little defensive. :spam:
http://startrek-urantia.blogspot.com
The REAL "LOL" is that you don't seem to recognize that your above statement underscores and exponentiates the fiction status of your 20th-century ludicrous, risible, and farcical landfill fodder about the Urantia tonsil-tickling pukage.
Wow. Gene Roddenberry. There's a spiritual authority for ya.
You're a gazillion kinds of all jacked-up. Nobody drawing breath on this oblate spheroid (that neither orbits the sun nor rotates on its axis, contrary to Kabbalah stupidity as "science") has less credibility than you and your peers.
Roddenberry. Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
Gen 3:22
22 Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, he might stretch out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— 23 therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken. 24 So He drove the man out; and at the east of the garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim and the flaming sword which turned every direction to guard the way to the tree of life.
It's far better to place ones faith/trust in the Holy Scriptures (inspired by the Holy Spirit) than to place ones faith in a man-made (up) fabrication!
You laughed at Jesus as well, and you are still waiting for the fictional Jewish Messiah to take up David’s imaginary throne.
"Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do"
I’ve been studying the Bible and the Urantia papers for 28 years, the blunders of the Bible are obvious to a lamp post. The God created in the "Jews own image" doesn’t even require scholarship; the life of Jesus discredited it. The OT is the modern day equivalent of a patriotic blockbuster movie meant to rally the troops and reenflate the deflated nationalist ego's of Judaism. They doubled down and concocted a fiction that keeps a good portion of the world in a backward worldview of utter silliness.
It's far better to place ones faith/trust in the Holy Scriptures (inspired by the Holy Spirit) than to place ones faith in a man-made (up) fabrication!
You should have left out the urantia fabrication, and stuck with the Bible!
The scripture make no claim of divine authorship. That idolatrous idea is a creation of the controlling priest class, they create mind numbed robots who are afraid to think for themselves because they have been brain washed into the belief that to question the scripture is to question God. But all jostling aside, I know that deep down inside you are a good person, a faithful person, a saved person who is just doing what you think is right. Those who mocked Jesus for being a mere carpenter from Nazareth thought they were doing a service to God by rejecting his teaching, torturing him, and killing his mortal body. False Messiahs had come before Jesus and after Jesus and even today. You really sincerely don’t know what you are rejecting. Pride blinds you.
2 Timothy 3:16 states: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"
The Son of God incarnate was divinely diplomatic, while he realized that the OT had many false representations of his Father and the facts of history, he chose to simply reveal the true Father and let the erroneous concepts of God in the OT die on the vine. He didn’t publically point out the false claims of the OT, he was not a reformer of the Law, he didn’t go around teaching that he was the Jews Messiah, he let men believe what they needed to believe about him.
You laughed at Jesus as well,
and you are still waiting for the fictional Jewish Messiah to take up David’s imaginary throne.
"Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do"
The scripture make no claim of divine authorship. That idolatrous idea is a creation of the controlling priest class, they create mind numbed robots who are afraid to think for themselves because they have been brain washed into the belief that to question the scripture is to question God. But all jostling aside, I know that deep down inside you are a good person, a faithful person, a saved person who is just doing what you think is right. Those who mocked Jesus for being a mere carpenter from Nazareth thought they were doing a service to God by rejecting his teaching, torturing him, and killing his mortal body. False Messiahs had come before Jesus and after Jesus and even today. You really sincerely don’t know what you are rejecting. Pride blinds you.
2 Timothy 3:16 states: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"
1) That wasn't "scripture itself" when the author of Timothy was giving his or her opinion.
2) The Church added Paul’s writings and those unattributed to Paul as part of their creation of authority in order to control. They EVEN considered their own councils to be inerrant.
3) NONE of the Bible books claim God as the author, Paul never conceived that future generations would convert his simple letters of advice into God's Word.
Second Epistle to TimothyFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Authorship
Further information: First Epistle to Timothy#Composition
Most modern critical scholars argue that 2 Timothy was not written by Paul but by an anonymous follower, after Paul's death in the First Century.[1][2]
The language and ideas of this epistle are notably different from the other two Pastoral letters yet similar to the later Pauline letters, especially the ones he wrote in captivity. This has led some scholars to conclude that the author of 2 Timothy is a different person from 1 Timothy and Titus. Raymond E. Brown proposed that this letter was written by a follower of Paul who had knowledge of Paul's last days.[3]
Jerome Murphy-O'Connor, however, would go further than Brown. He noted that a number of pseudepigraphic letters attributed to the Apostle were rejected in antiquity, indicating that there was not "a climate of acceptance, which would make it easy for the forged Pastorals to enter the mainstream of church life." Murphy-O'Connor continues,
Realistically, the only scenario capable of explaining the acceptance of the Pastorals is the authenticity of one of the three letters. Were one to have been long known and recognized, then the delayed "discovery" of two others with the same general pattern could be explained in a variety of convincing ways.[4]
Murphy-O'Connor then argues, based in part on recent research on the style of this work, that 2 Timothy was the authentic one of the trio. It was not widely known due to its private nature, but eventually published for the benefit of the church. Using it as a model, O`Connor suggests one of Paul's followers then wrote the other two Pastorals and was able to persuade his fellows that they were also previously unknown letters of Paul.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_2
Ummm... Nope. That would be impossible, since I'm in His hypostasis and having put on His prosopon. (But you have no idea what that means.) Yet more prevarication from you.
Ummm... Nope, again. His kingdom is not of this kosmos. He's seated in heavenly places; and I'm seated IN Him. He's at the dexios of the Majesty. Since I'm seated IN Him, I'm also at the dexios; so my whole man is claimed, including my thanatos prosopon. (You have no idea what that means, either. In your alleged 28 years of Bible reading, you've failed to know anything about what it actually means from the original languages.)
You know neither the Father nor the Son, denying the theopneustos graphe. Evidently you knew (or knew about) Gene Roddenberry. Maybe that will suffice, but I wouldn't count on it.
I'd suggest metanoia of hamartia; and pistis by charis, which cometh by akoe the Rhema. That's the only thing that matters. Hypostasis to hypostasis by the hypostasis of pistis, which is the pistis OF the Huios of Theos.
1) That wasn't "scripture itself" when the author of Timothy was giving his or her opinion.
2) The Church added Paul’s writings and those unattributed to Paul as part of their creation of authority in order to control. They EVEN considered their own councils to be inerrant.
3) NONE of the Bible books claim God as the author, Paul never conceived that future generations would convert his simple letters of advice into God's Word.
Second Epistle to TimothyFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Authorship
Further information: First Epistle to Timothy#Composition
Most modern critical scholars argue that 2 Timothy was not written by Paul but by an anonymous follower, after Paul's death in the First Century.[1][2]
The language and ideas of this epistle are notably different from the other two Pastoral letters yet similar to the later Pauline letters, especially the ones he wrote in captivity. This has led some scholars to conclude that the author of 2 Timothy is a different person from 1 Timothy and Titus. Raymond E. Brown proposed that this letter was written by a follower of Paul who had knowledge of Paul's last days.[3]
Jerome Murphy-O'Connor, however, would go further than Brown. He noted that a number of pseudepigraphic letters attributed to the Apostle were rejected in antiquity, indicating that there was not "a climate of acceptance, which would make it easy for the forged Pastorals to enter the mainstream of church life." Murphy-O'Connor continues,
Realistically, the only scenario capable of explaining the acceptance of the Pastorals is the authenticity of one of the three letters. Were one to have been long known and recognized, then the delayed "discovery" of two others with the same general pattern could be explained in a variety of convincing ways.[4]
Murphy-O'Connor then argues, based in part on recent research on the style of this work, that 2 Timothy was the authentic one of the trio. It was not widely known due to its private nature, but eventually published for the benefit of the church. Using it as a model, O`Connor suggests one of Paul's followers then wrote the other two Pastorals and was able to persuade his fellows that they were also previously unknown letters of Paul.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_2
The average (american) christian eats what the government, media, pastor and religious establishments serves them, not really their fault, seeing the multitudes are indoctrinated (spoon fed propaganda) from birth, programmed with a world opinion that pre-shapes, and conditions the mind to have alliance with their teacher, be it parent (deceived product of the system) or governmental agency stealing their identity as a creation with organic unalienable rights from their Creator, instead they have been paper trained.
They are enviromental canaries, lab rats, etc...for the inorganic pollutants rampent in society, Not many have had the ability of the fortunate class to escape these effects on their organic systems, leaving them weak and emontionlly erratic, and unkowingly being condistioned to be munipulated slaves, and fearful/hateful of goblins and ghosts on the government- churches taboo list.