The Evolutionist Koonin at it again

[Mr Jack]

No, they only contradict their interpretation of the evidence.

Wrong again, bob.

 

[Stripe]

Good one, Bob. :up:

 

[noguru]

I find it odd that evolutionists refuse to consider the possibility that Genesis is correct: i.e. multiple types at the beginning.

This hypothesis solves many problems.

1) abiogenesis,

2) how the DNA/RNA/protein interrelated complex arose,

3) how sexual reproduction arose,

etc.

Yes, but then it creates an even bigger problem than all 3 combined; "How do we formalize a hypothesis to test for God?" :think:

 

[noguru]

The raw data is not flawed, but the interpretation is.



No, they only contradict their interpretation of the evidence.

I know, and your interpretation is never contradicted by your own ad hoc explanations of other evidence. :chuckle:

One has to wonder why people who study this have not seen the light from your commentary yet.