Social/economic equality equates to being a spoiled brat?! :doh:
You're not only a hypocrite you blatantly dodge fundamental cause/effect reasoning. :third:
The Easiest Election In History
- Thread starter rexlunae
- Start date
Social/economic equality equates to being a spoiled brat?! :doh:
You're not only a hypocrite you blatantly dodge fundamental cause/effect reasoning. :third:
jeffblue101
New member
Got any classical?
and youre a liar, i said nothing like what you said.
Uhhh....Yes you did...and no less solicited the support of others via their quotes. #173
(Tell me that - like Trump - you're not to be held responsible for you own quotes.) :rotfl:
Ahem. Maybe liberals need reading comprehension help.
Maybe retake grade school, and extra credit for learning self control this time?
Sure...it's ALL my fault.
You're a real peach A4T.
yes, what you do and how you lie, is on you, not me or anyone else.
I think yall have a funny way of shifting accountability whenever it's convenient
Basic logic my friend...you don't want riots, don't incite them with hateful rhetoric. :idunno:
More finger wagging? Practice that motion in the mirror more often...you might become more adept at it.
This woman is who initially incited it:
Kshama Sawant warns of a larger anti-Trump protest in the future
She should be in jail, agreed.
'Hateful rhetoric', as in 'telling the truth'. Yall think that lies are better because the truth causes problems for you :chuckle:
That's the liberal way.
Depends on how you define "social/economic equality" because how you define it, may not be how I define it, or how the next guy defines it. The left has defined it by attempting play robin hood and steal the spoils of others labor to redistribute said spoils to others...sorry that is not equality, that is theft. Truth of it is "social/economic equality" cannot be defined unless you have a standard, and who decides what that standard is? You? Me? The simple fact that you & I live in free nation where we can speak, think, or achieve anything we desire without government intrusion was the standard set by the founders of this country to instill "social/economic equality", it is all right there in constitution. The corruption & perversion of that document has caused the strife we see today, furthermore the expansion of the federal government is not the answer to "social/economic equality", in fact it has made the situation worse, stealing the pursuit of happiness from all in the process.
Just for you, nice and soft and with a bonus character that has a lesbian voice to soothe you to dream of your liberal utopia.
Just for you, nice and soft and with a bonus character that has a lesbian voice to soothe you to dream of your liberal utopia.
That would impede the river I'm crying. I wish you conservatives would remain consistent. (though, this forum would then lose it's charm.)
big·ot
ˈbiɡət/
noun
noun: bigot; plural noun: bigots
a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow, by the very definition of the word, that would be the rioters.
You have no basis to accuse me of that. It's never come to that for me.
I don't expect you to call for your own candidate to yield when legally, he won. I'm just pointing out that it isn't a very democratic result.
In the general sense, yes. Though, not if you qualify it; get into the specifics.
But you don't want to do that ....do you?