The church is Catholic just as said in our creedsOh, I did not know you are Catholic. That's great.
I guess you didn't really "miss" anything. It was posed as a question, and I didn't know you were Catholic. That's all.
The church is Catholic just as said in our creedsOh, I did not know you are Catholic. That's great.
I guess you didn't really "miss" anything. It was posed as a question, and I didn't know you were Catholic. That's all.
The church is Catholic just as said in our creeds
If billions of people eat Christ at the same time, is he divided?
I'am not Catholic. But they sure do have fancy churches! My brother got married in one and it was enormous.
Romanists like to alter historical meanings when it comes to the church universal:The church is Catholic just as said in our creeds
They just buy into Rome's mythologies concerning the historical facts:
Note the Romanist's attempt to move the goal posts from a discussion of the factual historical development of the visible vestige of Our Lord's Bride (the church militant) to matters of doctrine.As opposed to the cacophony of contradictory protestant doctrine that has no foundation in the teachings of Christ, His apostles, or His Church?
Note the Romanist's attempt to move the goal posts from a discussion of the factual historical development of the visible vestige of Our Lord's Bride (the church militant) to matters of doctrine.
God knows what he is doing"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven."
God knows what he is doing
Mr. Irreligion is a dimwit.
He doesn't seem to be.
There's dimwits and there's dimwits. Anyone who keeps spewing out pejoratives like "Romanist" and "Romanism" and then follows them up with idiotic statements is a dimwit. Good Grief G, the man is insulting you right to your face.
Mat 16:15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?I think that what He must have meant to say was "on THE BIBLE I will build My Church." lain:
Romanists fail to read links provided in response to their claims. If they would they would know better. For if Reformed doctrine is a heresy of the sixteenth century then their claims of Augustine as one of their own are nonsense. This is what happens when your regula fidei is but Catholic Answers web sites and the like. :AMR:Same goalpost. Your doctrine is totally unhistorical. It was invented in the sixteenth century, by a heretic.
Indeed, you should not.He's called me a Romanist.
Is that any worse than calling someone a dimwit? Maybe it is.
It may have been intended as an insult.
But I can't find it in myself to feel insulted by it.
CC, meet Robert Pate.Mr. Irreligion finds time to spew out more ignorance. Maybe someday you'll become a Christian.
This gave me a good chuckle.Mr. Irreligion finds time to spew out more ignorance. Maybe someday you'll become a Christian.