the church

truthjourney

New member
drunk gt won't come back, neither will Jesus according to your denomination.

“Jesus is NOT Coming BACK, He Was Drunk When He said So” – Roman Catholic Leaders SAY

A SPOKESPERSON for the Vatican (Roman Catholic) has officially announced that the second coming of Jesus, the only son of the God, may not happen now after all, but urged followers to still continue with their faith, regardless of the news. Cardinal Giorgio Salvadore told WWN that this years 1,981st anniversary is to be the Vatican’s last in regards to waiting for the Lord to return to Earth.
vatican

“We just feel Jesus is not coming back by the looks of it.” he said. “It’s been ages like. He’s probably flat out doing other really good things for people somewhere else.” http://www.realtimenews.info/2016/07/jesus-is-not-coming-back-he-was-drunk.html
This originated from a parody/satire site called Waterford Whispers News.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
the meaning of your words are not the same as mine

Nope. A 6th grader knows what this means:

"what the church teaches seems to be a threat to many here"-you

I am the church-what I teach, threatens no one. Retract. You have 24 1/3 hours.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Nope. A 6th grader knows what this means:

"what the church teaches seems to be a threat to many here"-you

I am the church-what I teach, threatens no one. Retract. You have 24 1/3 hours.

no one is threatened by what you teach simply because you have no authority
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
no one is threatened by what you teach simply because you have no authority

So, you are arguing that the church has no authority? I am the church, along with other respective members of the boc.


"what the church teaches seems to be a threat to many here"-your argument

Fine. I am the church-what I teach, threatens no one. Retract. You have 24 1/3 hours.


When you are in a ditch, stop digging.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
Neither do you or your bogus "church".

What is commonly called "The Roman Catholic Church" is not a "church," as biblically defined. The proper name for that religious prostitute is:

The Roman Catholic Organization

I know...I know....You Catholic hater, John W.....We will pray for you....

Cricket....cricket...cricket...
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
So, you are arguing that the church has no authority? I am the church, along with other respective members of the boc.


"what the church teaches seems to be a threat to many here"-your argument

Fine. I am the church-what I teach, threatens no one. Retract. You have 24 1/3 hours.


When you are in a ditch, stop digging.

I am arguing that you are not the church so you have no authority
-only the church has authority
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
I am arguing that you are not the church so you have no authority
-only the church has authority

You changed your arument. That is slick...Real slick...


Members of the body of Christ, are the church, despite your made up protests, to the contrary. To wit:

1 Cor. 12 KJV

12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.

13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

14 For the body is not one member, but many.

15 If the foot shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?

16 And if the ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?

17 If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?

18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him.

19 And if they were all one member, where were the body?

20 But now are they many members, yet but one body.

21 And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you.

22 Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary:

23 And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness.

24 For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked.

25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another.

26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it.

27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.


Romans 12 KJV


1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service...........


4 For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office:

5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.



Ephesians 3:6 KJV That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:



Colossians 1:24 KJV Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's sake, which is the church:
 
Top