Darby:
"Reference to the second chapter of Galatians will confirm and establish the point historically as to the present dispensation, where not only is the fact stated of Paul having the ministry of the Gentiles, as Peter of the circumcision; but it was actually agreed on their conference, consequent upon the grace given, that Paul and Barnabas should go to the uncircumcision; and James, and Cephas, and John should go to the circumcision. And so far was the apostle's mind under Judaising influence, that it required a positive fresh revelation to induce him to go into company with a Gentile at all, and even after this he would not eat when certain came from James. In fact the Gentile dispensation, as a distinct thing, took its rise on the death of Stephen, the witness that the Jews resisted the Holy Ghost: as their fathers did, so did they" (Darby, The Apostasy of the Successive Dispensations).
Jerry, good to see you back in action!
A thought...
Darby's words "And so far was the apostle's mind under Judaising influence, that it required a positive fresh revelation to induce him to go into company with a Gentile at all" appear to imply that Peter's Acts 10 vision, etc., had been because Peter had been in error.
If so, Darby's is Classic Acts 2 Dispensational Thought there.
Per Matthew 23 and Matthew 28, etc., Peter was following THEIR Christ given marching orders in Acts 10.
It appears Darby was reading Mystery into Prophecy.
Peter was off in the latter part of Galatians 2 (re: his behavior at Antioch).
At the same time, also per a Galatians 2, he was not off-base in Acts 10, he had in fact been following his "Apostleship of the circumcision" in Acts 10, just as he had been instructed to.
Anyway, again; glad to see you pulled through!