ECT That Same Power

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
ROFL!

Foolish man, it was not about being rebuked of the sure promise of GOD of their restoration of land, it was about WHEN it would happen.

Sorry don't accept that.
Of course you don't, because you cannot accept scriptural truth.

Acts 1:6-7 KJV
(6) When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
(7) And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.


It's not them asking "IF" it would happen, but if it would happen AT THIS TIME.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
And so where is the whole chapter on this topic that you think he was supposed to explain, later in Acts? It is a rebuke because it was a misconception of Judaism, which could not accept the damning judgement of Christ that was already written in Dan 9.

That's why they never ask again; it was nailed. It was a rebuke. Your reading of the text is suspicious at best and bizarre at worst.

The kingdom of God was in the 'power' that was given; it is chosen as a kingdom term and God was about to go to work.

There is nothing in the NT that validates a future round 2 of Judaism for entirely different reasons. And certainly not RD's latest confusion of epochs, thinking that we NOW are the shadow awaiting the reality of Judaism to be practiced in the future, sheesh.
 

Ktoyou

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
The kingdom of God was in the 'power' that was given; it is chosen as a kingdom term and God was about to go to work.

What does this mean? I have never seen any theology suggest what is implied here! 'He was about to go to work', then stopped?
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
And so where is the whole chapter on this topic that you think he was supposed to explain, later in Acts? It is a rebuke because it was a misconception of Judaism, which could not accept the damning judgement of Christ that was already written in Dan 9.

That's why they never ask again; it was nailed. It was a rebuke. Your reading of the text is suspicious at best and bizarre at worst.

The kingdom of God was in the 'power' that was given; it is chosen as a kingdom term and God was about to go to work.

There is nothing in the NT that validates a future round 2 of Judaism for entirely different reasons. And certainly not RD's latest confusion of epochs, thinking that we NOW are the shadow awaiting the reality of Judaism to be practiced in the future, sheesh.

Made up.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Christ did not stop the disciples in their tracks in Acts 1 because it was the wrong 'time.' It was the wrong direction. It never manifests anywhere else in the NT. It's called a rebuke. The mission, however, took off and flourished, as was prophesied.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Christ did not stop the disciples in their tracks in Acts 1 because it was the wrong 'time.' It was the wrong direction. It never manifests anywhere else in the NT. It's called a rebuke. The mission, however, took off and flourished, as was prophesied.

Made up.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Seeking the timing is still the wrong approach no matter what. And besides, we don't know if they meant only those Jews who were believers, because they didn't clarify (which also happens when talking to D'ists).

Instead they learned they were to gain the power of the kingdom, another kind of kingdom, and that God was launching it.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Seeking the timing is still the wrong approach no matter what. And besides, we don't know if they meant only those Jews who were believers, because they didn't clarify (which also happens when talking to D'ists).

Instead they learned they were to gain the power of the kingdom, another kind of kingdom, and that God was launching it.
Sheer speculation based on your FALSE premise.

Luke 22:30 (KJV)
(22:30) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
The Entire Kingdom of God:

1. Earth. Resurrected Israel in the land, Gentiles come to God through them.
2. City. 144000 kings and priests. Mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, as told by the LORD
3. Heavenly. Body of Christ. Neither Jew nor Gentile.

Each has it's own purpose as determined by God.

Leave them alone. Do not mix them.
 

Danoh

New member
The Entire Kingdom of God:

1. Earth. Resurrected Israel in the land, Gentiles come to God through them.
2. City. 144000 kings and priests. Mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, as told by the LORD
3. Heavenly. Body of Christ. Neither Jew nor Gentile.

Each has it's own purpose as determined by God.

Leave them alone. Do not mix them.

You forgot Zion.

Speaking of which, did Mayberry have a Downtown; I don't recall.

Rom. 5:8
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Sheer speculation based on your FALSE premise.

Luke 22:30 (KJV)
(22:30) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.






That can't be RD because the power arrived. Ever heard of Pentecost and the explosive start of the church?
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
That can't be RD because the power arrived. Ever heard of Pentecost and the explosive start of the church?

Acts 2
41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.


Acts 2
47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved
 
Top