Interplanner
Well-known member
Where is the Acts passage or any NT passage that answers what Tam is clamboring to have answered?
Where is the Acts passage or any NT passage that answers what Tam is clamboring to have answered?
:mock: "Grammar scholar"Sorry don't accept that.
Vagueness is one of the primary features of his MO.If you would quote people, we could better understand who you are talking to, and what you're asking.
Vagueness is one of the primary features of his MO.
Of course you don't, because you cannot accept scriptural truth.ROFL!
Foolish man, it was not about being rebuked of the sure promise of GOD of their restoration of land, it was about WHEN it would happen.
Sorry don't accept that.
wow STP is absolutely brilliant! Has he always had this problem of not realizing the answer to his question may very well be in the post just above his?
The kingdom of God was in the 'power' that was given; it is chosen as a kingdom term and God was about to go to work.
What does this mean? I have never seen any theology suggest what is implied here! 'He was about to go to work', then stopped?
And so where is the whole chapter on this topic that you think he was supposed to explain, later in Acts? It is a rebuke because it was a misconception of Judaism, which could not accept the damning judgement of Christ that was already written in Dan 9.
That's why they never ask again; it was nailed. It was a rebuke. Your reading of the text is suspicious at best and bizarre at worst.
The kingdom of God was in the 'power' that was given; it is chosen as a kingdom term and God was about to go to work.
There is nothing in the NT that validates a future round 2 of Judaism for entirely different reasons. And certainly not RD's latest confusion of epochs, thinking that we NOW are the shadow awaiting the reality of Judaism to be practiced in the future, sheesh.
Christ did not stop the disciples in their tracks in Acts 1 because it was the wrong 'time.' It was the wrong direction. It never manifests anywhere else in the NT. It's called a rebuke. The mission, however, took off and flourished, as was prophesied.
Sheer speculation based on your FALSE premise.Seeking the timing is still the wrong approach no matter what. And besides, we don't know if they meant only those Jews who were believers, because they didn't clarify (which also happens when talking to D'ists).
Instead they learned they were to gain the power of the kingdom, another kind of kingdom, and that God was launching it.
The Entire Kingdom of God:
1. Earth. Resurrected Israel in the land, Gentiles come to God through them.
2. City. 144000 kings and priests. Mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, as told by the LORD
3. Heavenly. Body of Christ. Neither Jew nor Gentile.
Each has it's own purpose as determined by God.
Leave them alone. Do not mix them.
Sheer speculation based on your FALSE premise.
Luke 22:30 (KJV)(22:30) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
That can't be RD because the power arrived. Ever heard of Pentecost and the explosive start of the church?
That can't be RD because the power arrived. Ever heard of Pentecost and the explosive start of the church?