Ted Nugent blames the Jews

[PureX]

This thread was designed by one of your fellow God-haters to mock me, Ted Nugent is just one of the vehicles that zoo22 uses.

That being said: You've viciously deviated from the secular humanist code of ethics:

NEVER (and I mean NEVER) say a kind word about an adversary.

While I do appreciate you showing that Ted Nugent can display Christian love and compassion, I don't think widdle zoo22 does (it's his thread, therefore his rules, so play by them).

Ted Nugent is not my "adversary". Nor anyone else's that I know of.

Your internal bile is getting the better of you, once again, I see. I truly hope that someday that giant pustule inside of you will finally burst, and, if it doesn't kill you, you will finally be able to heal, and become a human being, again.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I see TOL's queen of drama is lurking about...

So put the mirror down then...

lain:

 

[Arthur Brain]

How do you expect anyone to take anything you say serious when you purposely use photoshopped pictures?

Well, to be fair, nobody does apart from himself...

 

[Rusha]

Ted Nugent is not my "adversary". Nor anyone else's that I know of.

Eh, mine either. In actuality, he is a retard ... which means it is better to poke fun at him ... or just ignore him.

 

[Crucible]

Jewish people are typically very liberal. Jewish politicians even more so. It's a liberal tendency to control guns....not a a Jewish one. It just makes some people jump to conclusions when they see Jews pop up when gun control is the issue. I don't think Ted is really stupid enough to believe there is a conspiracy.

Pretty much.

There's a stronger force of conservatism than liberalism out in Israel. They have never been typically liberal people despite what we see in certain parts of the 1st World.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
This thread was designed by one of your fellow God-haters to mock me, Ted Nugent is just one of the vehicles that zoo22 uses.

That being said: You've viciously deviated from the secular humanist code of ethics:

NEVER (and I mean NEVER) say a kind word about an adversary.

While I do appreciate you showing that Ted Nugent can display Christian love and compassion, I don't think widdle zoo22 does (it's his thread, therefore his rules, so play by them).

Ted Nugent is not my "adversary". Nor anyone else's that I know of.

And now a few kind loving words about "anyone else":

Your internal bile is getting the better of you, once again, I see. I truly hope that someday that giant pustule inside of you will finally burst, and, if it doesn't kill you, you will finally be able to heal, and become a human being, again.

I wish that I had the post where you in your roundabout way talked about murdering Christians (I might still have it in the table of contents in one of my WHMBR! threads).

Perhaps you can recall those kind loving words that you used PureX and quote them here?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

My good friend PureX views vary when it comes to dealing with rabble rousers like me and other Christians . Here, in a segment about homosexuality and violence, PureX shows his kind loving and ever so tolerant view:

Quote:
Originally Posted by PureX
Jesus didn't live in a time that had idealized freedom. But we are living in such a time. I believe it is right for human beings to destroy those among them who wish to subjugate their fellow human beings. I believe it's right to do so for the survival, well-being, and advancement of humanity.

This is not an ideal that anyone in Jesus time would have understood. That would be my exception to violence being reserved for responding to an otherwise unreasonable and imminent threat.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4021223&postcount=1699

In all fairness to my good friend PureX, he doesn't always want to murder me, sometimes he'll settle for deportation:

From my now defunct "Preserve Marriage Washington" thread:

Quote: Originally posted by PureX

If you really wanted to preserve marriage as the religious bonding that you imagine it to be, you should be petitioning Washington to get out of the marriage business all together.

If people want to make a legal contract with each other, let them go to a lawyer and write it up. If they want a "holy union", let them go to their church and perform the required ritual. If they want to do both, let them do both. But if you want to use the power of government to punish people for having sex outside your own moral parameters, you are going to be disappointed, sooner or later. Because that isn't what the power of government is for in this country.

If you want to protect the sanctity of "holy matrimony", then you need to get the government out of it all together.

But I suspect that isn't really what you want. I think what you really want is to use the power of government to punish anyone who has a different moral standard than you. And for that, you should lose your citizenship, because you have shown that you hate freedom, you hate equality, and don't want justice for all. You are seeking to deny these to your fellow Americans and that makes you are a traitor to the ideals that this country holds dearest.


PureX, from deep down in my heart, I feelz the love.

 

[Tambora]

From "Jailbait" by Ted Nugent: Well, I don't care if you're just 13 You look too good to be true I just know that you're probably clean... Jailbait you look fine, fine, fine... It's quite alright, I asked your mama Wait a minute, officer Don't put those handcuffs on me Put them on her, and I'll share her with you

What the heck?! :noway:

What a perv :vomit:

First time I've heard of this song of his.
:shocked:
VERY disturbing.

 

[zoo22]

So Ted The Ped Nugent I mean Brother Ted is pro gun. Okay, got it. But in his "anti-gun control" piece:

What's the point of having an Israeli flag next to all of these people?

Why would he make a point of calling NYC "Jew York City"?

Why is Bloomberg described as a "911 Israeli agent"?

Why would the description of Sen. Frank Lautenberg say "Gave Russian Jew immigrants your tax money"?

Why call out that Rahm Emanuel "Served in Israeli army during Gulf war"?

Brother Ted doesn't mention any other group but Jews... Are there no non-Jewish gun control advocating politicians?

Seriously. What do the Flags or any of those weird comments about Jews have anything to do with gun control, unless you're blaming Jews?

"Jew York City"? What an epic tool.

Someone would have to be a complete idiot to pretend that this isn't completely anti-Jew.

 

[Rusha]

First time I've heard of this song of his.
:shocked:
VERY disturbing.

Indeed ... I agree with WoO. What a pervert.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So Ted The Ped Nugent I mean Brother Ted

(How come zoo22 is completely silent when I talk about all of the pederasty and pedophilia going on in the LGBTQueer movement in my WHMBR! threads? Selective morality perhaps?).

Do you realize that you too could be my "Brother" zoo? All that you have to do is accept Jesus Christ as your Savior and drop of all the secular humanist propaganda that you so warmly embrace.

is pro gun. Okay, got it. But in his "anti-gun control" piece:

What's the point of having an Israeli flag next to all of these people?

Why would he make a point of calling NYC "Jew York City"?

Why is Bloomsbury described as a "911 Israeli agent"?

Why would the description of Sen. Frank Lautenberg be "Gave Russian Jew immigrants your tax money"?

Why call out that Rahm Emanuel "served in Israeli army during Gulf war"?

Brother Ted doesn't mention any other group but Jews... Are there no non-Jewish gun control advocating politicians?

Notice Nugent didn't belittle any conservative Jews, only the secular ones.

Seriously. What do the Flags or any of those weird comments about Jews have anything to do with gun control, unless you're blaming Jews?

"Jew York City"? What an epic tool.

Someone would have to be a complete idiot to pretend that this isn't completely anti-Jew.

For being such a Jew hater/hater of Israel, why would Ted Nugent write a pro Israel article against your beloved Hamas? (come on zoo, look me in the eyes and talk directly to me).

http://humanevents.com/2009/01/06/israels-path-to-peace/

Now that you've gotten that out of your system: Let's address how you secular humanists embrace Margaret Sanger, someone who was an avid racist and Jew hater.

Come on zoo, you can do it (that is if you have any energy left in you from bashing "Brother" Ted Nugent).

 

[zoo22]

(How come zoo22 is completely silent when I talk about all of the pederasty and pedophilia going on in the LGBTQueer movement in my WHMBR! threads? Selective morality perhaps?).

Do you realize that you too could be my "Brother" zoo? All that you have to do is accept Jesus Christ as your Savior and drop of all the secular humanist propaganda that you so warmly embrace.



Notice Nugent didn't belittle any conservative Jews, only the secular ones.



For being such a Jew hater/hater of Israel, why would Ted Nugent write a pro Israel article against your beloved Hamas? (come on zoo, look me in the eyes and talk directly to me).

http://humanevents.com/2009/01/06/israels-path-to-peace/

Now that you've gotten that out of your system: Let's address how you secular humanists embrace Margaret Sanger, someone who was an avid racist and Jew hater.

Come on zoo, you can do it (that is if you have any energy left in you from bashing "Brother" Ted Nugent).

Uh oh, looks like aCW has toilet paper hanging out of the back of his his pants again and he's pretending he doesn't smell it.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Uh oh, looks like aCW has toilet paper hanging out of the back of his his pants again and he's pretending he doesn't smell it.

(Why is that they always make reference to the anus in their attempt at humor?).

I have an idea zoo: There are Christians out there that do hate Judaism because of what they did to Jesus Christ (I guess that they don't stop to think that Jesus was born to die on the cross), I see a few here on TOL.

Perhaps when your buddy WizardofOz is finished at his Ron Paul/David Duke rally, he could email Ted Nugent and ask him if he really does hate all Jews and Israel or if it's just the secular gun grabbing ones?

As you might recall, WizardofOz (aka Aaron) is very good at emailing, when you and your LGBTQ movement were bashing my former pastor Ken Hutcherson for going to a foreign country that was recriminalizing homosexuality, Aaron did his part by emailing Pastor "Hutch" asking him if he thought homosexuality should be recriminalized (Aaron never was very good at math, evidently adding one plus one was too difficult for Aaron to figure out).

 

[User Name]

First time I've heard of this song of his.
:shocked:
VERY disturbing.

TED NUGENT - Jailbait

​

 

[WizardofOz]

I'm creeped out by your and zoo's defense of an absolutely filthy sexual behavior that frequently involves the molestation of children. You on the other hand aren't.

I am creeped out by any adult who has sex with 13-year-olds.

I am even more creeped out by creepy dudes writing and performing creepy songs about being a creepy pedophile.

You are the other hand, aren't. That's creepy.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I am creeped out by any adult who has sex with 13-year-olds.

I must have missed that in this post:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3922003&postcount=3

and in the David Bowie thread that Nazaroo started.

I am even more creeped out by creepy dudes writing and performing creepy songs about being a creepy pedophile.

You are the other hand, aren't. That's creepy.

Yet you never denounce a certain Congressman from Texas who voted against federal legislation that prohibits virtual child pornography.

"In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share my colleagues' revulsion at child
pornography, [Daddy Paul throws in a disclaimer] I do not believe that this justifies expanding the federal
police state to outlaw distribution of pornographic images not containing
actual children."
http://www.politechbot.com/p-03690.html

Creepy.

 

[WizardofOz]

I am creeped out by any adult who has sex with 13-year-olds.

I must have missed that in this post:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3922003&postcount=3

and in the David Bowie thread that Nazaroo started.

:hammer:
Do you need to look the word "any" up in a dictionary? If Bowie had sex with 13-year-olds, that is creepy.

I don't defend any pedophilia, unlike yourself. You are creepy for defending Nugent who is an admitted pedophile who even glorified it in his music.

Yet you never denounce a certain Congressman from Texas who voted against federal legislation that prohibits virtual child pornography.

"In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share my colleagues' revulsion at child
pornography, [Daddy Paul throws in a disclaimer] I do not believe that this justifies expanding the federal
police state to outlaw distribution of pornographic images not containing
actual children."
http://www.politechbot.com/p-03690.html

Creepy.

Another deflection. I too, am repulsed by child pornography just as he is.

Spoiler

Here is Congressman Paul's statement on morphed child porn: Mr. Speaker, as a parent, grandparent and OB-GYN who has had the privilege of delivering over 4,000 babies, I share the revulsion of all decent people at child pornography. Those who would destroy the innocence of children by using them in sexually-explicit material deserve the harshest punishment. However, the Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act (HR 4623) exceeds Congress' constitutional power and does nothing to protect any child from being abused and exploited by pornographers. Instead, HR 4623 redirects law enforcement resources to investigations and prosecutions of "virtual" pornography which, by definition, do not involve the abuse or exploitation of children. Therefore, HR 4623 may reduce law enforcement's ability to investigate and prosecute legitimate cases of child pornography. HR 4623 furthers one of the most disturbing trends in modern politics, the federalization of crimes. We have been reminded by both Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and former U.S. Attorney General Ed Meese that more federal crimes, while they make politicians feel good, are neither constitutionally sound nor prudent. Rehnquist has stated that "The trend to federalize crimes that traditionally have been handled in state courts . . .threatens to change entirely the nature of our federal system." Meese stated that Congress' tendency in recent decades to make federal crimes out of offenses that have historically been state matters has dangerous implications both for the fair administration of justice and for the principle that states are something more than mere administrative districts of a nation governed mainly from Washington. Legislation outlawing virtual pornography is, to say the least, of dubious constitutionality. The constitution grants the federal government jurisdiction over only three crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It is hard to stretch the definition of treason, counterfeiting, or piracy to cover sending obsence or pornographic materials over the internet. Therefore, Congress should leave the issue of whether or not to regulate or outlaw virtual pornography to states and local governments. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share my colleagues' revulsion at child pornography, I do not believe that this justifies expanding the federal police state to outlaw distribution of pornographic images not containing actual children. I am further concerned by the possibility that passage of HR 4623 will divert law enforcement resources away from the prosecution of actual child pornography. HR 4623 also represents another step toward the nationalization of all police functions, a dangerous trend that will undermine both effective law enforcement and constitutional government. It is for these reasons that I must oppose this well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed bill.

Still waiting for you to denounce a certain hero of yours who is an admitted pedophile...:juggle:

Or are you alacarte with defending pedophilia too?

 

[Crucible]

 

[User Name]

If Bowie had sex with 13-year-olds, that is creepy.

I'm not sure where aCW got the "13-year-old" thing from--other than from Nugent's "Jailbait" song. Lori Mattix, by her own admission, was 15 when she hooked up with Bowie. At that time, Bowie must have been about 24 or 25. If that was the case, it might not be considered statutory rape in some states even under today's laws, which have close-in-age exceptions that allow those aged 15 and 16 to engage in acts with those less than ten years older.

Here's to the Eagles and literally standing on the corner in Winslow Arizona.

Take it easy Glenn Frey (RIP).

Speaking of the Eagles, "Don Henley was arrested in 1980 in Los Angeles and charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor after paramedics were called to his home to save a naked 16-year-old girl who was overdosing on cocaine and Quaaludes. He was fined $2,000, given two years' probation, and ordered into a drug counseling program." -- http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...and-rock-n-roll-s-statutory-rape-problem.html

By the way, Henley was about 33 years old when that event occurred.

 

[WizardofOz]

I'm not sure where aCW got the "13-year-old" thing from--other than from Nugent's "Jailbait" song. Lori Mattix, by her own admission, was 15 when she hooked up with Bowie. At that time, Bowie must have been about 24 or 25. If that was the case, it wouldn't be considered statutory rape in some states even under today's laws, which have close-in-age exceptions that allow those aged 15 and 16 to engage in acts with those less than ten years older.

Still creepy.

aCW is just being a tool as usual. I don't give a hoot about Bowie and the above makes him a creep in my book. My whole point is my finding it pathetic when as soon as someone dies, people like aCW come out from under their rock to spit on people's fresh graves.

Criticize the living, not someone who literally just passed away.

Then to find out that aCW is a defender and a 'brother' of Ted Nugent who is an admitted pedophile and even a glorifier of pedophilia.

It's just aCW being a hypocrite with no standards or consistency i.e. alacarte about just about everything he spouts off about. It's why he brings up Bowie or Ron Paul when we're talking about Nugent. He's deflecting from his own hypocrisy.

This is all why people like him have absolutely zero credibility.

Speaking of the Eagles, "Don Henley was arrested in 1980 in Los Angeles and charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor after paramedics were called to his home to save a naked 16-year-old girl who was overdosing on cocaine and Quaaludes. He was fined $2,000, given two years' probation, and ordered into a drug counseling program." -- http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...and-rock-n-roll-s-statutory-rape-problem.html

By the way, Henley was about 33 years old when that event occurred.

Geez. I did not know that.

My point about Frey was that after he died aCW is posting tributes to him. I've got nothing against the guy and like the Eagles music better than I care for Bowie's. But, when he's in a thread asking if anyone has evidence that Bowie repented before death and I simply asked him if he had any evidence that Frey did, he started drooling and foaming at the mouth like he usually does when he paints himself into a corner.

It's like watching a monkey flinging poo at the zoo. He usually ends up covered in it himself.