CRASH said:No. It doesn't start with his buzz word "revelation"
Is that because he only gets his "revelations" when he's buzzed? :banana:
CRASH said:No. It doesn't start with his buzz word "revelation"
Everyone.[/QUOTE said:---W--O--O--O--W-W-W-W; ----- AAAaaMaaaZZzing Grace, you ALL HAVE. You're blessed of you lord.
*
--------------Paul---
*
It's funny that you should post on this thread, you're the only poster on TOL I've ever seen that makes even less sense than Squeaky. You need to get some counseling. :shut:Letsargue said:---W--O--O--O--W-W-W-W; ----- AAAaaMaaaZZzing Grace, you ALL HAVE. You're blessed of you lord.
*
--------------Paul---
*
Aimiel said:I read enough of them to see that he doesn't have a grasp of Truth, and subsequently began simply skipping all the out-of-context Scripture that he slings together to create the demonic doctrines that he then briefly explains. I have yet to see him be willing to take any advice or to understand any 'sound' doctrine at all. He thinks he already knows everything, and doesn't have need for any man to teach him anything. When someone is no longer teachable, they become worthless. The Word of God says that a fool has a better chance than someone who is vain. Squeaky is exhalted in his own vanity. His foolishness could be easily taken care of, if you could get past his pride. He often reminds me of the knight in Monty Python's movie, "Holy Grail:" "Oh, it's just a flesh wound. Come back here, I'll bite your head off."
I believe that every word in that post could just as easily apply to you, because you walk in more of the exact same error that Squeaky does. You're both un-fit, due to personal exhaltation. God hates the proud, and both of you are very high on His List. :banned:Letsargue said:Look at the **** your talking about here in this post of yours, and you call that Christian doctrine??? Yah, O.K.
Good question! The impression I get from his posts is messianic presence who is here to condemn us all to Hell. Sorta like :Letsargu: with slightly better grammar.Delmar said:Who is Squeaky?
Aimiel said:I believe that every word in that post could just as easily apply to you, because you walk in more of the exact same error that Squeaky does. You're both un-fit, due to personal exhaltation. God hates the proud, and both of you are very high on His List. :banned:
Frank Ernest said:Good question! The impression I get from his posts is messianic presence who is here to condemn us all to Hell. Sorta like :Letsargu: with slightly better grammar.
You said that no humans are going to hell.Letsargue said:---AIN'T NOBODY, condemning NOBODY. You condemn yourselves. THANK GOD THERE'S A HELL. -- This one's for you Squeaky.
*
-----------------Paul---
*
Letsargue said:---The lake of fire was prepared for the Devil and his angels. That is all there is in it. Nothing or no one else is there or are going there. All who go there are demons, children of the devil. What do you think a demon is anyhow??? A Gremlin??? – NO!! - They’re people. The Lord cast seven devils out of Mary Magdalene; the seven who were joined to her in fornication. It just says seven devils. What is a child of the devil??? What is a child of God??? There’s just two, the just and the unjust.
*
-------------Paul---
Mr. 5020 said:You said that no humans are going to hell.
He believes that because Jesus spoke to the devil who spoke through Peter directly, that it meant that Peter was a devil. I think he also believes that everyone on earth is a devil whose name isn't, "Letsargue."Mr. 5020 said:You said that no humans are going to hell.
Aimiel said:He believes that because Jesus spoke to the devil who spoke through Peter directly, that it meant that Peter was a devil. I think he also believes that everyone on earth is a devil whose name isn't, "Letsargue."
Letsargue said:---AIN'T NOBODY, condemning NOBODY. You condemn yourselves. THANK GOD THERE'S A HELL. -- This one's for you Squeaky.
*
-----------------Paul---
*
No, Peter was without understanding, so when he spoke what a demon had caused him to think was truth Jesus rebuked the source of those words, but Peter wasn't demon-possessed.Letsargue said:The Devil was in Peter and spoke through him, which is the definition of a demon or devil.
You could say that, but it isn't technically correct. One who is even demon-possessed isn't really a devil, they simply have surrendered control of their flesh to a demon(s). They are still a man (descendant of Adam).Letsargue said:Ye are of your father the Devil. That means that the Devil has you as a child, or a demon or devil, which is also an angel of the Devil.
Nope. Wrong again. The lost are humans, who need salvation. Demons are real spiritual beings, not humans who have become 'evil.'Letsargue said:If you want to see a demon or devil, all you have to do is look at the lost; that is who they are.
No, Satan is Lucifer, who fell from grace, as did many other angels. He is the first to sin, and the father of lies.Letsargue said:Satan is all of the lost collectively.
Okay, cheif. Whatever you say.allsmiles said:Throw CRASH and Aimiel into the mix and you've got yourself a remake of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.