Originally posted by Poly
I don't even think you know exactly what you're saying.
Yes, I do. If you wanna waste your afternoon attacking me to make yourself feel better, knock yourself out.
Originally posted by Poly
I don't even think you know exactly what you're saying.
Is that a statistic that falls under the authority of the USPS?Originally posted by Gerald
:darwinsm:
Relative to the human population, the percentage of idiots has remained pretty much constant.
The only difference is that we hear about them more often, now.
Yes it is. They know all and see all.Originally posted by On Fire
Is that a statistic that falls under the authority of the USPS?
You are right that there are basic truths that are not dependent on opinion. It is like whether or not a person believes Jesus is the savior. He either is or isn't, what an individual believes has no bearing on the truth. Having said that, the example about the kid and the teacher has also become more of a problem because of the unwillingness to take responsibility. We have reached a point in time where a parent has to do an independent investigation to determine what really happened. One example is, my wife, Mrs. Morpheus, works in a school. She has walked in on more than one conversation where a school administrator and a couple of teachers were planning how they were going to get one of the kids. Not because of anything specific the child did, but because they didn't like him. Another example was my own daughter who didn't do exactly what a teacher told her. She never denied that. The problem was the teacher, in an attempt to defuse a possibly bad response, called me at home prior to my daughter getting home. She told me that she lost her temper and went in the restroom and dragged my daughter out of a stall. I even let that go. When the vice principle and the teacher went to great lengths to get my daughter to change her story about how the teacher pulled her out of the stall, I had to intervene. The teacher continued to deny to the administrator what she had already admitted to me. My point in all of this is that we cannot just assume that an authority figure is right. Sometimes our own children are more responsible. To take the teachers side against your own child under such circumstances can damage forever your relationship with your child.Originally posted by cattyfan
some of what's in the article, though, are not thiings that should be debatable based on someone's beliefs. Like when a kid misbehaves in school and parents defend the kid instead of siding with the teacher. Or when someone commits a crime then seeks to find an excuse for their behavior. Those actions are clearly breaking rules and laws, and yes, I think people SHOULD regret doing those things.
The question is, why don't you?
Originally posted by wickwoman
Eowyn:
I've been married for 18 years because I WANT to stay married, not because I'm afraid society will think ill of me if I divorce. Love is the motivation to be married, not fear of stigma. People are unhappy and as Granite said, they do often rush into big decisions. And, divorcing your mate seems to be life change of choice these days. But people will learn that the grass in the other pasture is NOT greener. You can't tell them, they have to taste for themself. The only way to help the ills of society is to teach people to pursue true peace of mind and happiness and it doesn't come from books or preachers, it comes from within.
Originally posted by wickwoman
Dear Eowyn:
Do you think child molesters will stop molesting children because we stigmatize them? Do you think they don't know its wrong when they do it? There is something wrong with a child molester. They think that molesting children will make them happy. They need to find out what true happiness is. Stigmas mean nothing to a child molester. What good does it do you or them?
Originally posted by wickwoman
Dear Eowyn:
What is the purpose of the stigma if it doesn't change behavior? Wouldn't your efforts be better placed to solving the problem rather than talking about how bad it is?
It's the same lack of humility that causes us to presume that WE know what's right and what's wrong and that everyone else should learn from us what these are, that causes other people to presume they're right when they do things that we believe are not right at all. This is why Jesus told us to take the stick out of our own eyes, first. But we never do get that stick out of our eyes. In fact, the more certain we are that we have no stick in our own eyes, the bigger that stick becomes.Originally posted by Morpheus You are right that there are basic truths that are not dependent on opinion. It is like whether or not a person believes Jesus is the savior. He either is or isn't, what an individual believes has no bearing on the truth. Having said that, the example about the kid and the teacher has also become more of a problem because of the unwillingness to take responsibility. We have reached a point in time where a parent has to do an independent investigation to determine what really happened. One example is, my wife, Mrs. Morpheus, works in a school. She has walked in on more than one conversation where a school administrator and a couple of teachers were planning how they were going to get one of the kids. Not because of anything specific the child did, but because they didn't like him. Another example was my own daughter who didn't do exactly what a teacher told her. She never denied that. The problem was the teacher, in an attempt to defuse a possibly bad response, called me at home prior to my daughter getting home. She told me that she lost her temper and went in the restroom and dragged my daughter out of a stall. I even let that go. When the vice principle and the teacher went to great lengths to get my daughter to change her story about how the teacher pulled her out of the stall, I had to intervene. The teacher continued to deny to the administrator what she had already admitted to me. My point in all of this is that we cannot just assume that an authority figure is right. Sometimes our own children are more responsible. To take the teachers side against your own child under such circumstances can damage forever your relationship with your child.
By the way, it was Cain that asked, "Am I my brothers keeper?" after having killed Abel. To some degree we are our brother's keeper. We are responsible for warning them of the standards. We are to try to pull them from sea of sin, not hold them under if they don't listen.
Originally posted by Gerald
Atheism used to be stigmatized...
Indeed. You can't be legally killed anymore for being one...not in the civilized world, anyway...Originally posted by granite1010
It still is, to a lesser extent.
Machiavelli understood this when he wrote The Prince, a book that anyone involved in politics needs to have read.Can you honestly imagine an open--not a militant; just an admitted--atheist running for president?
No matter who you are, you still need to bend over backwards and grovel before a Christian church of some kind to get a winner's stamp of approval.
I do! I'm still :chuckle: at Nineveh's statement.Originally posted by erinmarie
WAIT A DARN MINUTE! I know a Berta Eddy....hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
I'm surprised that no one else does!