Richard Dawkins - will he debate the existence of God?

[kmoney]

Who is?

 

[The Berean]

Who is?

He is.

 

[CRASH]

Why?

 

[SUTG]

He is.

Why is he?

 

[SUTG]

Who is?

No, who is on first base.

 

[mighty_duck]

Why is he?

He is why he is.

 

[Granite]

I take it there's been no word, then?

 

[The Berean]

Why is he?

Because he is not a she.

 

[The Berean]

I take it there's been no word, then?

No word from whom? He or she? :idunno:

 

[The Berean]

He is why he is.

That's sounds like a circular argument a YEC would use. You just can't assert "he is".

 

[zoo22]

Why is he?

Why is he what?

Because he is not a she.

What?? Who is she??

 

[The Berean]

Why is he what?

He is what because he is not why

What?? Who is she??

She is not he.

 

[Nathon Detroit]

Not a peep. From the "Dawk", or the "Dawkites".

 

[Granite]

Ah well. Can't say I'm surprised. Would've been nice though.

 

[The Berean]

Not a peep. From the "Dawk", or the "Dawkites".

Is that like the" Hoff"? :chuckle:

 

[mighty_duck]

Is that like the" Hoff"? :chuckle:

Precisely, just with less chest hair.

 

[The Berean]

Precisely, just with less chest hair.

:rotfl:

 

[Vern Reed]

I quote one of the wags on that site:

"A little known fundy web site promotes a debate between an internationally known scientist and author and an ex jail bird fundy nut job who was jailed for abusing children. You are taking the **** mate."

Now that's a reply!

 

[kmoney]

Well, Dawkins is out. Who is next on the list.

 

[simongc]

all these debates can be easily settled; next time you pray say " Lord we need your help. Don't send Jesus, Come Yourself "