Republican Civil WAR: MAGAs vs. RINOs -- Who Will Win?

In the coming Civil War between MAGA and RINOs, who will win?


  • Total voters
    7

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
You'd better support DeSantis against Trump in 2024 then:

View attachment 5699
The term "RINO in disguise" seems redundant, since a RINO is simply a non-Republican trying to disguise himself/herself as a Republican. Instead of saying "a RINO in disguise", one could leave out the superfluous and unnecessary redundance by saying "a non-Republican in disguise", or simply "a RINO".

And, while "RINO in disguise" is redundant, "RINO Republican" is an oxymoron; "RINO Republican" = "[non-Republican] Republican".
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
The term "RINO in disguise" seems redundant, since a RINO is simply a non-Republican trying to disguise himself/herself as a Republican. Instead of saying "a RINO in disguise", one could leave out the superfluous and unnecessary redundance by saying "a non-Republican in disguise", or simply "a RINO".

And, while "RINO in disguise" is redundant, "RINO Republican" is an oxymoron; "RINO Republican" = "[non-Republican] Republican".
Don't be so critical, he's doing the best he can as a bot
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Tucker says Republican Senators who condemned him today like Mitch McConnell, who is “living in splendor on Chinese money,” must have some secret reason for opposing him. He’s not sure what it is yet, but he’s going to investigate.
What "reason" has been given by anti-Republicans like Mitch McConnell for opposing Tucker? If any "reason" they may have given is not actually a reason (you can agree that not everything called a "reason" is actually a reason, right?), then they have not given a reason; and if they've not given a reason, then whatever reason they may have is, ipso facto, some secret reason. So, despite the fact that the phrase "some secret reason" was from your mocking commentator, and not from Tucker (so far as I can tell from the video), what would be wrong with pointing out that if McConnell, et al, have a reason they've not disclosed, it is thus some secret reason? Absolutely nothing.

Why would you want to not learn whether or not McConnell and his fellow Democrats are trying to conceal what has motivated their desire to censor Tucker?
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
What do you mean by "voting against social security"?
@User Name: <NO ANSWER>

Jefferson had said:
Social Security should be phased out. People who paid into it should receive what they paid for, just like any contract.

People should at least be given the choice to have Social Security taxes removed from their paychecks with the understanding that they will provide for their own retirement. It's called "freedom" - that word liberals seem to hate so much.
To which you reacted by saying:

Where did Jefferson say anything like "voting against social security"? I'm not seeing that he did. Seems you're hallucinating again.
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank

marke

Well-known member

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
To be accepted among the leftist in-crowd people must show they hate Trump as much as Hillary does for no logical reason. Disagree with the mob and your star will be shot down.

Exactly. I'll bet a lot of celebs who criticize Trump actually voted for him. They lie to advance their Hollywood careers.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Here's Lindsey Graham proving that he's an evil RINO for the millionth time:


How can MAGAs take the country back from the Demonrats when they can't even take their own party back from the evil RINOs?
 
Top