Not exactly, since the Catholic Church also acknowledged the imputational aspect of initial justification along with its infusional aspect. Catholicism teaches that righteousness is both infused and imputed to the repentant believer. The error of the Protestants was in rejecting the infusional element of justification.
...or else that was exactly why they made the distinction: it is not infused. The ex Adventist minister who taught me about the Reformers said that the main error of the church down through the ages has been to confuse or mix justification with transformation. He referred to them as objective vs subjective salvation, or legal vs moral, as God's work in Christ for us vs God's work through the Spirit in us.
No one is served by confusing or mixing them.