beloved57
Well-known member
review with me the following posts and the points I made therein:Your posts 120, 123 are not different from 124.
Here is my response to your post 124, which I have repeated once before.
"If you only understood what you wrote. If you believed exactly what you wrote, then you would be on the right track of understanding the atonement of Christ.
You make the same error with Rom 5:6-10. You insert a limitation upon the text that is not present.
Christ's reconciliation was for all sinners. Every single human being, including the world. Christ gave life to the world. Rom 5:18, I Cor 15:22.
Your view as you state it with its limitation, means that all other human beings are not sinners. What they might be is unknown, but we know they were NOT sinners. As in your view, ONLY sinners were reconciled to God.
But I know you will not even attempt to understand what I have stated.
You will use your ole fall back mantra and show your inability to actually comprehend an argument against your view."
And guess what, you have used your ole fall back mantra to avoid answering it. If you do not understand what I have stated, just ask an question of what you might not understand.
If you think I am incorrect, don't repeat the same statement, but give additional support to what you stated.
120,123,124 they go together. Lets see if you understand them !
Now are you going to do what i asked or not ?