Oh, you want to talk about stars now?
Real Science Radio: More Soft Tissue Confirms RSR Dino Prediction
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
You asked me for data indicating that the universe is in a mature state, being approximately 13.8 billion years old, so I gave some to you. It all ties in together: old universe, old earth, old dinosaur fossils.
That's what the "oh, wait" implied.:dunce::duh:
You have no idea what my level of curiosity is.
You do realize you're speaking of recent events, don't you? And still many crimes go unsolved because there are no witnesses. And even those that do are solved because the perpetrator confesses.
No, it doesn't.
We are talking about dino soft tissue, which dramatically opposes the notion that dinos are old.
Your star story might be good evidence that the universe is as old as you claim, but it is of no relevance here.
Learn to stick to a topic. :up:
And while you're at it, tell JD off for his stupid analogy. It will do your credibility a power of good.
Sure I do. Not in your Holy Book, or contradicts it, you simply give the evidence no value.
But Stripe, if the "star story" might be good evidence that contradicts your "Bible story". Difficulty dealing with too much information at once?
It might be. Feel free to start a thread and discuss it. :idunno:
Nope. Just noting that the first evidence User presented to refute dino soft tissue is starlight. :dizzy:
6days
New member
So ... expansion was faster than the speed of light...but God is not?Username said:
Poor conclusion.Username said:
You already agreed that there can be a condition where something is faster than the speed of light. We are told about that in Genesis 1. God created the stars and two days later they could be seen from earth.*
The Milky Way Galaxy is not spreading apart faster than the speed of light. There are stars in our own galaxy that are over 100,000 light-years away from us. This requires a lot of time, or at least the appearance of considerable age.
Your deity does not exist. None does.
6days
New member
You ignored the question I put to you...."So ... expansion was faster than the speed of light...but God is not?"
And you ignored ...
"You already agreed that there can be a condition where something is faster than the speed of light. We are told about that in Genesis 1. God created the stars and two days later they could be seen from earth."
According to JD's analogy there should be a "car on a bathroom scales" worth.
However, the evolutionists decided his ignorant analogy should get a pass.
Yes.
Most would simply never consider it necessary (and it is expensive).
So get the crack scientists at Liberty University to build a radiometric test lab and get those Nobels. Put your $ where your mouth is.
Are you determined to be a troll your entire life?
Carbon dating fossils is expensive, it's unnecessary, and it also destroys a perfectly good fossil.
Fossils are found in sedimentary rocks. Sedimentary layers cannot be directly dated because the sediment is comprised of preexisting, older minerals. However, other types of layers can be directly dated, such as volcanic ash beds. Using methods such as Potassium–argon dating, layers above and below the sedimentary layer in which a fossil is found can be dated. The age of the sedimentary layer in which fossils are found can then be estimated to be somewhere between the ages of the layers below and above it:
Last edited:
I made a simple suggestion that would eliminate your whining about the lack of carbon dating of dinosaur bones. Sounds to me like a perfectly sensible way to resolve your complaint. Get a creation science lab set up to do the work, collect the fossils and publish. And you accuse me of trolling?
So it is expensive. Get the $ from some televangelist---they seem to be able to rake in the $. Or just add a few bucks to the tuition at Christian fundamentalist colleges. Hit up AiG for the dough.
Put your $ where your mouth is.
Only if you're sold out to evolutionism.
However, scientists have no problem with collecting data.