I agree in principle. As with any business, if you're in the business of providing a service to the public you should do so. What you do for one you should do for all.
Pediatrician refuses to care for lesbians' baby
- Thread starter nikolai_42
- Start date
she cared for the child by providing for her care with a qualified colleague
she cared for Christ by refusing to support a perverted lifestyle
Tinark
Active member
Providing medical services for a child and communicating with the parents now constitutes "support" for the lifestyle? Are you for real?
unless you're a lawyer, eh? :chuckle:
'cause if you're a lawyer, the civil and criminal rules of procedure regarding trials and time allotted any counsel to produce a defense is rebuttal enough, in other words, no one could be harmed in any way by an attorney's refusal to take on a particular client and the court can and will appoint counsel of its choice where there is an absence of public defenders or counsel eager to take on a given, etc.
what scumbags you disgusting hypocritical pervert loving lawyers are
yes, i am
can you show where, in scripture, Christ said that we should accept perversion?
Tinark
Active member
How is providing medical services for a baby and speaking with someone about the baby an acceptance of perversion?
you're not paying attention
GFR7
New member
She might possibly have believed that as a sperm donor was used, the child had been deliberately robbed of a father, which to some constitutes a form of abuse. She may not have wanted to impose this belief on them (she said as much, that she was sorry to hurt them and wanted them to enjoy parenthood). The colleague provided the medical care.
Well, no. I still think you should take on clients without regard for race, creed, color, etc. I've never said otherwise.
What I distinguished was the difference, practically, between the physician and the possibility of harm and the attorney and the lack of harm resulting.
you're such a twisted pervert i don't believe you actually have the ability anymore to speak clearly
i quoted your words
let them speak for themselves
Tinark
Active member
Why would the belief have to be imposed on them? Why can't this doctor keep her beliefs and judgments to herself in the work environment? It's basic professionalism.
Without context, which I then provided.
Tinark
Active member
You aren't being logically coherent - providing medical services and communicating with a sinner is _not_ an acceptance of the sin or the lifestyle. It's just something you made up.
GFR7
New member
She will have to speak further, if we are ever to know. The colleague simply said, "After praying, she felt she could not treat Bay [infant]".
Tinark
Active member
In-vitro fertilization services for a same-sex couple is one thing. A doctor refusing to perform that service that is against their beliefs makes sense - it would be participating in an act they find immoral.
Providing medical services for a baby and talking to the parents is nothing like that.
Do you understand the difference, resodko?
Providing medical services for a baby and talking to the parents is nothing like that.
Do you understand the difference, resodko?
Tinark
Active member
It only looks that way because of your logical incoherence you demonstrate in your statements.
Wow. Another dishonest thread about me.
Who'd have imagined.
On topic and in answer to the thread I won't participate in:
Of course the embarrassment has nothing to do with their sexuality and everything to do with the doctor waiting until they're in the office to have a colleague publicly inform them they weren't going to be allowed to keep the appointment no one made her take to begin with.
x2