"you do the work and tell me what I said 13 months ago"
".... and hurry up so I can come back and correct you."
"you do the work and tell me what I said 13 months ago"
I am responding to all the questions.
Tell me again then what you would like me to answer, but make sure you do one question at a time and tell me what I said in reply earlier.
No, you weren't.
:doh:
I was saved by what Christ did alone in His obedience Rom 5:19!
Nice cherry pick, from one of the books you think holds all the weight, from a Bible version which you feel best upholds your views
I don't even need to refute MADism, it refutes itself.
is not the same as Christ dying for the ungodly (Romans 5:6 KJV)/enemies (Romans 5:10 KJV). It's not the same as the due time message of the man Christ Jesus giving Himself a ransom for all (1 Timothy 2:4-6 KJV)!
What to look for in Calvinists = Total Depravity
They are depraved people and they can't shake it.
Good point. Jesus only died for the sins of all the world, no one else.
I don't think John 1:29 KJV passage is about the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, in comparison, of His arrival.Good point. Jesus only died for the sins of all the world, no one else.
Calvinists also believe that Jesus only died for some people, but not everyone.
There is evidently quite a few of you on TOL.
So you claim to not be depraved, but declare yourself sinless?
Good luck with that . . .
View attachment 24786
Not sure I understand what you mean, 'Jesus only' ?
Is this statement the same? "Jesus died for the sins of all the world"? I do not understand what other group was left out?
I believe all of the Bible is for our learning, but it's not all to us or about us. It means what it says as it says it and to whom. I do not cherry pick. That would be an accusation that could be railed against someone who chooses one verse over another that appears to contradict it rather than someone who recognizes that to reconcile it, one would need to know who is being addressed and the context in which it is written. You are more likely a cherry picker than I.Nice cherry pick, from one of the books you think holds all the weight, from a Bible version which you feel best upholds your views
I don't even need to refute MADism, it refutes itself.
See?Coming from someone who rejects even communion, which has been universally practiced as a command of the church since the beginning of Christianity, those words don't affect me much. It's not the KJV, it's YOU.
Also
:mock: KJV-only
:chuckle:And I defend my Christian brothers and sisters when they are unnecessarily treated wrongly.
Right. It was a direct threat.My warning had nothing to do with me or my beliefs.
:chuckle: Eagles Wings is the one who was over the top in objection (out of nowhere) of my use of numskull which is a variant spelling of numbskull. And you threatened me over my response. Get over yourself.It is sickening to witness MAD disrespect and hatefulness shown to Christ's dear children, day after day. God will only permit so much of it before He intercedes on behalf of His own.
The group heir promotes.
You reject the new Covenant of Grace .
Heard a great sermon today from Angus Stewart. He said so much of the church today is okay with depravity (original sin), but not total depravity. We still have that little bit of possibility that we can save ourselves.
This doctrine is key for understanding that God is the only source of grace for salvation, not man, and yet most are not willing to spend time studying this deeply.
Hardly over the top, heir. I'd be good to make amends and promise not to "swoop" in to correct grammar and spelling. I don't need to do that.:chuckle:
Right. It was a direct threat.
:chuckle: Eagles Wings is the one who was over the top in objection (out of nowhere) of my use of numskull which is a variant spelling of numbskull. And you threatened me over my response. Get over yourself.
Nang is old and has always gone a bit hyper over her theology, as of disagreement is a personal attack. She is basically a harmless old lady who gets too bent out of shape when anyone, as she perceives, is 'attacking' her beliefs.
This Calvinist droid Nag is a real downer, bummer, barbiturate.