Morpheus
New member
would your kid have acted in a manner that might have required it?
Punching a kid is justifiable? Careful, your lack of character is showing.
would your kid have acted in a manner that might have required it?
Punching a kid is justifiable?
Careful, your lack of character is showing.
Absolutely nothing would "require"---or permit---a so-called "pastor" to put a hand on my child. Period.would your kid have acted in a manner that might have required it?
Jesus possessed divine and messianic authority. You and I decidedly do not. So much for using Jesus' cleansing of the Temple as an excuse for being a jacka**.Jesus flipped a table and chased people with a whip.
Absolutely nothing would "require"---or permit---a so-called "pastor" to put a hand on my child. Period.
No self-defined "pastor" is in any way "in charge" of my children. The answer is "no."you don't believe those in authority should have the right to deal out corporal punishments to the misbehaving children in their charge?
No self-defined "pastor" is in any way "in charge" of my children.
you don't believe those in authority should have the right to deal out corporal punishments to the misbehaving children in their charge?
No self-defined "pastor" is in any way "in charge" of my children. The answer is "no."
Being "in charge" of such a situation means keeping the kids safe and sound, feeding them, instructing them. It certainly does not mean striking or placing hands on my child. Ever.a youth pastor on an outing with some of the children in his church isn't in charge?
Being "in charge" of such a situation means keeping the kids safe and sound, feeding them, instructing them. It certainly does not mean striking or placing hands on my child. Ever.
Being "in charge" of such a situation means keeping the kids safe and sound, feeding them, instructing them. It certainly does not mean striking or placing hands on my child. Ever.
Being "in charge" of such a situation means keeping the kids safe and sound, feeding them, instructing them. It certainly does not mean striking or placing hands on my child. Ever.
Its one thing to say that pastors and other authorities can engage in corporal punishment. Note that I am not saying they can (I'd prefer they didn't) but that's an argument that I think could be had. If I had kids and the pastor and I couldn't see eye to eye on this issue, I wouldn't put the kid under his care. I can deal with that.
Its another thing to condone "punching a kid in the chest", which is clearly not intentional corporal punishment, but assault.
what makes the difference between "intentional corporal punishment" and "assault"?
Only in the restricted sense just described.so the youth pastor in that situation would be in charge of your child.
Contact the child's parent. (Note, the "pastor" is not his parent.) No one puts a hand on my child.if your child was acting in a disruptive and dangerous (to themselves or others) manner, what would you have the pastor do?
Contact the child's parent. (Note, the "pastor" is not his parent.) No one puts a hand on my child.
That would be acceptable.in the situation in the op, that's the route I'd take - make little cruci sit out the activities and miss playing with the other kids and have a nice long talk with the parents when they came to collect him.
In that case, one would do what any adult bystander would do. The child may even need to be physically restrained---again, in order to protect him and/or others. This is not, however, the same as a non-parent striking the child or administering some sort of physical punishment. That's an absolute no-no.suppose his behavior was endangering others? suppose we're crossing the street as a group holding hands and he starts horsing around with a couple of other kids and won't respond to verbal admonishments? what then?
Jesus possessed divine and messianic authority. You and I decidedly do not. So much for using Jesus' cleansing of the Temple as an excuse for being a jacka**.