annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
She indicts herself. All you have to do is listen to her, man.
Over 100,000 Psychiatric Disorders Like Hallucination & Suicide Reported After COVID Vaccination
- Thread starter Gary K
- Start date
She indicts herself. All you have to do is listen to her, man.
Look that the VAERS numbers and multiply them by 99 and you'll have some idea. But those numbers will be rising dramatically because the vaccine kills the immune system, damages the heart and brain, as well as multiple other organs and those deaths are growing massively. It's like Michael Yeadon and Ryan Cole say. This is mass genocide.
Since I don't have those numbers would you do the math for me? Are you saying that more people have died from the vaccine than have died from COVID-19?
Riiiight! Most doctors have never reported anything to VAERS. Even nurses who started reporting to VAERS when they found out about it say it is a long and trying process to make a report and their reports are rejected for the slightest of reasons. It's not a trivial process.
The only ones I know of to lie about the numbers are the media. They distoert them on a regular basis. I've seen no evidence of false reports except from people like you who take twitter reports with no evidence at face value. Find yourself a study that demonstrates anything close to your claim and I'll listen to you.
You can't do a search for VAERS numbers? Try openvaers.
I'm asking for the numbers that you approve of.
Right Divider
Body part
So because they CAN, that's proof enough for you, right?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
You're damning your own information. Because most of the data in VAERS isn't provided by health professionals, you have absolutely no way of knowing if the data is corrupted by any number of variables. None. No way of knowing.
Once again, nothing but bald faced assertion with zero evidence to support it. Where is your evidence? Where are your studies to support this nonsense?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I'm using YOUR information. YOU stated that "VAERS database is only used between 1% and 10% the time by doctors and nurses."
Are you saying your numbers are nonsense?
Yeah, I'm going to send you to a site I don't trust or believe. I've done nothing but referenced VAERS so why would you think VAERS numbers would be unacceptable for your calculations? You're nuts.
No I'm not. That's what multple peer review studies say. You're questioning their conclusions not mine. You're the one being anti science. All I did was use the multipliers those studies provided. And to you that's me making a claim? Are you insane?
I'm simply asking you to provide your estimate for the number of people who have been killed by the coronavirus vaccines. Why won't you do that?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
When you put up those numbers, you're supporting those numbers.
If you don't believe or trust or support those numbers, why are you posting them in the first place? Aren't you prepared to stand behind them?
And when those numbers are taken at face value, you don't want to own your own post?
I think deep down you know that the vast majority of information being uploaded to VAERS cannot be scientifically verified. In fact, you may even recall the VAERS disclaimer:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers.
VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind. . . .
Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:
- The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
- Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
- VAERS does not obtain follow up records on every report. If a report is classified as serious, VAERS requests additional information, such as health records, to further evaluate the report.
- VAERS data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
- VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.
I showed you how to figure things out for yourself.. Go run the numbers and then we'll compare notes. Or are you too stupid to do that? The implications of your comments are that you believe neither the VAERS numbers or the peer reviewed studies because even a grade schooler can figure these things out.
You obviously don't want to stand by your own numbers. That's why you won't give them.
LOL. You can't even do grade school math. If I was you I'd be really embarrassed at displaying that amount of ignorance. Unable to do even simple multiplication.
When you put up those numbers, you're supporting those numbers.
If you don't believe or trust or support those numbers, why are you posting them in the first place? Aren't you prepared to stand behind them?
And when those numbers are taken at face value, you don't want to own your own post?
I think deep down you know that the vast majority of information being uploaded to VAERS cannot be scientifically verified. In fact, you may even recall the VAERS disclaimer:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers.
VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind. . . .
Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:
- The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
- Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
- VAERS does not obtain follow up records on every report. If a report is classified as serious, VAERS requests additional information, such as health records, to further evaluate the report.
- VAERS data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
- VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.
LOL. You are as stupid as anna. Neither one of you is capable of doing grade school level math. Talk about disinformation agents.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Oh, ffreeloader. How sad to see you how who've said how you were verbally abused in your past be so free in doing the same to others. You didn't break the cycle. You're spending all your time in this thread throwing insults rather than support the data you posted.
Yeah, I've seen your "sympathy" before telling me you've never seen anyone who deserved to be abused more than I did. Sometimes I just engage you to see just how low you will go. You never disappoint as there are no depths of dishonesty which you will not plumb.
I'm easily bored so you and your ilk provide a level of distraction.
I have other things to do now so you'll have to try to amuse others which is sure to entertain them