"The name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19-20 NIV) is "The Most Holy Trinity."
This thread is specifically for triune believers. No other need or should post here.
I'm personally boycotting these cultists threads against our view. I have found none of them are here to learn a thing and they certainly don't make a cogent or compelling presentation. Its a waste of bandwidth and time from my experience. This thread is for posting material to help us on our way.
I believe that the triune god is a false god.
There fore I am a triune believer.
I believe that Jesus spoke of a devil therefore I believe in a devil
You speak of a triune god, but it is a false god.
I believe that there are false gods, of which your triune god is one.
Thus, you have not excluded me from this thread.
*
According to this nonsense you, jerzy and meshak are the redeemed and the true church that ever was is following a false god...you need to think some more. You think a false god produced the Salvation Army?
Oh.Absurd. No.
The requirement for salvation is
Romans 10:9-10
There is nothing in there about a trinity
The two requirements are so simple, even a trin can get saved.
You do agree that
1. Jesus is lord
2. God raised him from the dead
or not?
"The name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19-20 NIV) is "The Most Holy Trinity."
The Pauline understanding of LORD is YHWH. Verses about YHWH in the OT are applied to Jesus in the NT (see LXX also).
'Jesus is Lord' is a confession of His Deity. This is one reason the Romans persecuted Christians (vs Caesar is God) and Jews accused them of blasphemy for making Jesus God.
It is not mere sir, lord, generic jesus/lord. The context in Phil. 2, Rom. 10, etc. is LORD YHWH, not lord elton john.
How do you know what part of Sacred Scripture is trustworthy & what part is "wrongful addition?"The early church fathers quoted those verses many times but without the trin formula in them
The must have had texts which predate the ones we have.
the ones we have wrongful additions
There is no scriptural record of the believers doing that
Baptizing was baptizing in the name of Jesus Christ
How do you know what part of Sacred Scripture is trustworthy & what part is "wrongful addition?"
How I would answer this question: What did the earliest church believe?, and in this case, from as early as we can know, she called God by the name "Trinity."
And I think you've still got a Matthew 16:18 problem: "I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it," vs., over 90% of Christian churches pray to a "triune pagan god."
Oh.It would help immensely if you would actually study church history relative to the extensive and prolonged development of the Orthodox Trinity doctrine.
How do you know what part of Sacred Scripture is trustworthy & what part is "wrongful addition?"
How I would answer this question: What did the earliest church believe?, and in this case, from as early as we can know, she called God by the name "Trinity."
And I think you've still got a Matthew 16:18 problem: "I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it," vs., over 90% of Christian churches pray to a "triune pagan god."
How do you know what part of Sacred Scripture is trustworthy & what part is "wrongful addition?"
How I would answer this question: What did the earliest church believe?, and in this case, from as early as we can know, she called God by the name "Trinity."
And I think you've still got a Matthew 16:18 problem: "I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it," vs., over 90% of Christian churches pray to a "triune pagan god."
How do you know that Matthew 28:19-20 was wrongfully added & Matthew 6:9 was not?Work
the answer is obvious
since scripture never calls God a trinity, "the earliest church" was in error
You really like to embarrass yourself?
Did Jesus Christ teach to pray to a "triune pagan god"?
No, if you had read and believed scripture, which your "the earliest church" didn't
you would have know that Jesus Christ taught to pray to
"our Father, who is in heaven"
Matthew 6:9
" After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name."
Not a pagan triune god.
Do you trins even open a Bible?
" After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name."
How do you know that Matthew 28:19-20 was wrongfully added & Matthew 6:9 was not?
Does the church predate the writing of the Gospel of Matthew?
When I analyze the available information in order to draw a conclusion, it is hard work. It's easier to just make sure I've got the necessary information, because having the necessary information & all of it, makes my analysis a cinch.I read.
Work
II Timothy 2:15
Evidently something trins have not yet learned
When I analyze the available information in order to draw a conclusion, it is hard work. It's easier to just make sure I've got the necessary information, because having the necessary information & all of it, makes my analysis a cinch.
When I analyze the available information in order to draw a conclusion, it is hard work. It's easier to just make sure I've got the necessary information, because having the necessary information & all of it, makes my analysis a cinch.
When I analyze the available information in order to draw a conclusion, it is hard work. It's easier to just make sure I've got the necessary information, because having the necessary information & all of it, makes my analysis a cinch.