Hear this: The dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not transphobic!Blackburn and others were hoping to get either that or a quote to use back against trans supporters.
Hear this: The dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not transphobic!Blackburn and others were hoping to get either that or a quote to use back against trans supporters.
Speaking for myself, my "transphobia" exists in the same manner that my "schizophobia" does... transphobic conservative base ...
I said she is "a face of the left" at the moment for obvious reasons.
The simple definition of the word "woman," which everyone knows anyway and for which there is no point in pretending that one doesn't know, is not "transphobic." Wow.
Probably, but if she had simply answered the question straightforwardly she would have avoided much embarrassment for herself and for everyone who is left of center politically. Instead, by avoiding the question and pretending that she couldn't define a simple word, Judge Jackson gave Sen. Blackburn exactly what she was hoping to get!
You're insaneTo automatically attach "the left" to "Democratic" is a right-wing position ...
There's no doubt in my mind that the question was asked in order to determine how far gone she was wrt wokeness... there's no doubt why the question was asked.
I have no idea what her politics actually are. My point is that she is currently "a face of the left" in the media for no other reason than she has been appointed to the SC, to replace a liberal judge, by a Democratic president. One can reasonably draw some inferences.Because she was nominated by a Democratic president, as you said? There are a lot of moderate or liberal Democrats out there. To automatically attach "the left" to Democrat is a right-wing position.
You said that "Blackburn tossed out a gotcha question, meant to provide red meat to the transphobic conservative base". My point is that if the simple dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not inherently transphobic (which it isn't) then there is no red meat to toss.I didn't say the word woman was transphobic, did I? I'm surprised at you.
I referred to the "transphobic conservative base." And that's who Blackburn was talking to, and for.
She didn't. Here's how it went:She did answer straightforwardly, and without 'stammering,'
From Blackburn herself: "... The fact that you can't give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about ..."... there's no doubt why the question was asked.
I have no idea what her politics actually are.
My point is that she is currently "a face of the left" in the media for no other reason than she has been appointed to the SC, to replace a liberal judge, by a Democratic president. One can reasonably draw some inferences.
You said that "Blackburn tossed out a gotcha question, meant to provide red meat to the transphobic conservative base". My point is that if the simple dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not inherently transphobic (which it isn't) then there is no red meat to toss.
Here's how it went:
Why couldn't Judge Brown answer the question, "Can you provide a definition for the word ’woman’," if said definition is not inherently transphobic? As I said, if the simple dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not inherently transphobic (which it isn't) then there is no red meat there to toss to the transphobic conservative base."The simple definition of the word "woman," which everyone knows anyway and for which there is no point in pretending that one doesn't know, is not "transphobic." And then doubled down with "Hear this: The dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not transphobic!"
When no one here said that the definition was transphobic.
Then you know that Judge Brown did not answer the question straightforwardly or without stammering, as you said she did.I know how it went.
Graduation from public schools and universities with lowered academic standards makes a mockery of boasting about educational achievements. The lowering of standards for job placement also makes work history no indication of academic excellence. If a person is now chosen because of sex or skin color then intelligence is also not a factor. Being appointed to leftist commissions or organizations because of skin color does not prove a person is qualified for the job.
If asking the woman of color what a woman is proved too hard for her to answer then why is she even applying for the job of SCOTUS justice?It was a dumb question by Blackburn, meant for showboating, who btw can't tell the difference between the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
Misleading. Most do.A biologist will tell you there are three kinds of differences typically seen between genders including genital, genetic, and brain differences. Many individuals do not have all three differences!
Not generally.the concept of gender is more complicated than Dick and Jane depicts.
Republicans and democrats have failed God and America by neglecting to submit only those candidates to fill judgeships who have solid convictions and right understandings of the intent of the Constitution and the will of God.
Why couldn't Judge Brown answer the question, "Can you provide a definition for the word ’woman’," if said definition is not inherently transphobic? As I said, if the simple dictionary definition of the word "woman" is not inherently transphobic (which it isn't) then there is no red meat there to toss to the transphobic conservative base.
Then you know that Judge Brown did not answer the question straightforwardly or without stammering, as you said she did.
Here's how it went:
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals judge point-blank: “Can you provide a definition for the word ’woman’?
After a short back-and-forth, Jackson ultimately said: “No, I can’t.”
“You can’t?” Blackburn asked.
“Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said.
Lefties don't know how to tell the difference between good understanding and sheer stupidity. The leftis democrats are going to confirmm her because they have stolen the political power to do so and nobody can stop them. All the showboating is just for show. They might have well asked her things like:Dumb politically charged questions worthy of some dodging.
Graduation from public schools and universities with lowered academic standards makes a mockery of boasting about educational achievements.
Judge Jackson is definitely a dedicated leftist democrat or she would not be currently where she is in the Senate hearing room.Why is it embarrassing for "the left?" Do you think Judge Jackson is "the left?"
No prominent leftist liberal dares define what a woman is since so many of the base supporters of the democrat party are flaming sodomites.In the context of particular statutes the definition of the term can vary. Any question for the judge is best taken in a legal context, not just informal semantics. The Judge had other reasons to answer the question with more caution.
At no point did I say you said that. You're taking this discussion personally somehow. It isn't.You could at least own that you inadvertently (I hope) misrepresented what I said by implying I'd said the definition itself was transphobic.
Blackburn should have asked the following:If asking the woman of color what a woman is proved too hard for her to answer then why is she even applying for the job of SCOTUS justice?