Nang
TOL Subscriber
On behalf of whom?
Do you have no conception of what a "spiritual sacrifice" is?
Really?
On behalf of whom?
Thought you said the kingdom of heaven was Christ crucified?
Do you have no conception of what a "spiritual sacrifice" is?
Really?
I don't see heir hungering and thirsting to learn righteousness by seeking the Kingdom of Heaven . . .
She has found a small pond where she can act like a big fish, and she is satisfied.
You would be doing yourself a big favor by listening to Heir carefully.
.No, we are now able to come directly to God through Christ Jesus.
There are no more sacrifices for sin that can be made.
As priests we offer spiritual sacrifices.
I said Paul taught nothing but Christ crucified.
Dispensationalists (especially MAD ones) think that the Kingdom of Heaven is different than Christ crucified. Not so . . .
Do you have no conception of what a "spiritual sacrifice" is?
Really?
She has found a small pond where she can act like a big fish, and she is satisfied.
Of course he doesn't
He thinks he's the big toe of the High Priest.
In STP and heir's world of MAD, spiritual sacrifices are for those lowly "kingdom believers" only.
STP and heir think they have been deified, and they think they ARE the High Priest.
heir denies the New Covenant, and heir denies the Royal Priesthood of believers.
As STP asked you, were you satanic, and lost in the 25 years that you were a dispensationalist?
STP and heir think they have been deified, and they think they ARE the High Priest.
You should give up John Nelson Darby, and come into the Kingdom.
...since we deny the NC is implemented now, per the above? Are we not saved, since you say that dispensationalism is satanic, antichrist?
Nope, it's the truth.
There are more Christian Zionists than there are Jewish Zionists thanks solely to John Nelson Darby.
/QUOTE]You should give up John Nelson Darby, and come into the Kingdom.[
Show us the "evidence," chapter, and verse, that "argues," as you do, that members of the body of Christ are not not to be taught by other members of the body of Christ, whether that member teacher be dead(i. e., via his/her writings),or alive.
Only to Darby followers does it make no sense.
Because of the demarcation line Darby made between Israel and the church, you have to dismiss everything about the law and prophets that Christ Jesus fulfilled.
Show us the "evidence," chapter, and verse, that "argues," as you do, that members of the body of Christ are not not to be taught by other members of the body of Christ, whether that member teacher be dead(i. e., via his/her writings),or alive.
Listening to heir would be the dumbest thing anyone could do.
heir is a follower of John Nelson Darby and E.W.Bullinger.
heir denies the New Covenant,
and heir denies the Royal Priesthood of believers. Not to mention all the other false teachings of Darby and Bullinger that heir parrots on TOL.You should do yourself a big favor and drop Dispensationalism like a bag of dirt.
Give up the false teachings of John Nelson Darby, and come into the Kingdom.
Show us the "evidence," chapter, and verse, that "argues," as you do, that members of the body of Christ are not not to be taught by other members of the body of Christ, whether that member teacher be dead(i. e., via his/her writings),or alive.
Is heir lost, since you assert that she denis the New Covenant, and Paul's gospel, according to you?