This is where you lose all credibility. When a Dispensationalist says they don't follow Darby, then I immediately know they are in denial....
I read your posts. Your a HUGE Zionist. Everything you post about Zionism comes from Darby.Again, you're in denial.
"You follow the teachings/inventions/theories of men...Darby..Bullinger"-3 years of spam by Craigie the clown.
Caught, again, in the same lie/deceit/sophistry.
The actor, continually makes the charge that us meanie dispensationalists "follow men," which is a satanic "argument" of sophistry, and means NADA, unless he is going to contend that the bible, in Romans-Philemon, or anywhere else, makes no provision for respective members of the boc to teach others.
And he asserts, then, that 2 Tim. 2:2 KJV should be deleted from the bible-on record.
And, as I've asked him, over and over, as to why he adds "of men," to his spam "argument?" I've asked him, "Whom should we follow-you? Are you a man? Aliens?"
It's a satanic, deceitful ploy, on his part, as adding "of men" adds NADA to his "argument," or anyone else's, and flips the bird at the LORD God, as
he knows that we are to have teachers. He just does not like what we've been taught, and deceptively spams "You follow Darby...Bullinger...teachings of men...", being so obsessed with allegedly disproving the dispensational approach to interpreting scripture. All he has to do, is present his case, as to why he thinks (fill in the blank) is a false doctrine, and continue to present that case. But he does not do that. He will inevitably, when he is getting picked apart, fall back on this satanic spam of sophistry. As if he has "the teachings/inventions/theories of God?"
And, to confirm his wickedness, he spams "inventions/invented" on every third "post." Are not all false doctrines, "invented/inventions?" Again, it's a satanic spam of sophistry on his part. That's one of his deceitful "arguments" against dispies, that his father the devil taught him.
And-his lying, again:
I asked deceiver Tet:"Who taught you?" His response:
"Reading the Bible
Listening to sermons by pastors
Reading books and commentaries about the Bible
Bible Studies
Theology classes
Interacting on TOL
Having conversations with other believers
Unlike you, I haven’t subscribed to one systematic theology that was made up my men that keeps me from believing the Bible"-Tet.
Thus, the deception:
"Listening to sermons by pastors"-Tet.
=teachings/inventions/theories of
men
="man made belief system." Prove it is "God made."
"Reading books and commentaries about the Bible"-Tet.
=teachings/inventions/theories of
men
="man made belief system." Prove it is "God made."
"Bible Studies"-Tet
=teachings/inventions/theories of
men
="man made belief system." Prove it is "God made."
"Theology classes"-Tet.
=teachings/inventions/theories of
men
="man made belief system." Prove it is "God made."
"Interacting on TOL"-tet.
=interacting with those men/women on TOL who teach/=made up my men
="man made belief system" Prove it is "God made."
Thus, he is a deceiving hypocrite, actor, as he concedes "men" taught him. He's a flim flam man, despite his spinning like a top , bobbing and weaving until he has little circles flying around that mind of mush of his.
Slick, very slick......slick as an eel, and serpent, slithering down a toilet/drain pipe. Pathetic. Satanic. Sophistry.
Who do you think your trying to bamboozle on this board, Craigie the Clown? Your Aunt Bertha, or your crazy Uncle Joe? Keep posting. Contrasts between you and me. I like them.
Here is what you are, Craigie-a deceiving con artist, and habitual liar, with your sophistry "inventions of men..teachings of men....man made doctrine" trash you spam on every thread.
The lies, and sophistry:
This thread:
"When a Dispensationalist says they don't follow Darby, then I immediately know they are in denial"-Craigie the Clown
"I hold to many doctrines."-Tet.
When a "AD 70-ism/Preterist like Craigie, says they don't follow Russell, King, Sproul, DeMar, Gentry, Hanegraaf..............., then I immediately know they are in denial.
See how that works, punk?
Craigie asserts that he does not follow them, or any "teachings of
men."
Further evidence, of his habitual lying:
"Yes, but not a "Full Preterist". I would consider myself a "Partial Preterist". I can explain later if you like..:
I believe a lot of things that preterists believe, however, I don't like some of the baggage that comes with calling oneself a preterist."-"-Craigee Joe Preterist Tet.
He admits he follows the teachings/inventions of Preterists.
Now, produce those "God made" teachings that these infallible teachers you claim you have, gave you.
Deceiving punk, clown, and con artist, spamming your deceit, and sophistry, on TOL.