Then why your bizarre comment about "lying little snowflakes running out of places to hide" Jefferson? I'm presuming this was in relation to those left or centre left? Or was it a Freudian slip and you really meant far right wingnuts instead?Libs don't fear they will be censored. They fear that people who express conservative views (like Donald Trump) will not be censored.
Of course it's a right on this forum. If you want to put someone on ignore then you have the right to do so, non mods at least. Your right, your prerogative.
If anna or anyone else holding differing political beliefs to the self advertised conservatism on here wanted an echo chamber then they wouldn't post here, they'd go to a forum that reflected solely their own.
You seem to be more miffed that anna has chosen not to engage with you anymore and you're hardly the core of this forum are you?
Libs don't fear they will be censored. They fear that people who express conservative views (like Donald Trump) will not be censored.
I have 3 other people on ignore, one who doesn't currently post here and I haven't bothered to remove and two others who are too unlikeable or too pathological (or both) to bother with.
It's nobody else's business but yours - and those who act like children based on a lack of attention? Well, enuff said.Nicely done, Arthur.
You know what's funny? I don't have even have him on ignore.
I have 3 other people on ignore, one who doesn't currently post here and I haven't bothered to remove and two others who are too unlikeable or too pathological (or both) to bother with.
Here's the funny thing about his whole temper tantrum: I put people on ignore based on their behavior, not on their ideology. So much for the ol' echo chamber... I might take someone off ignore, or put them on - but whose business is it but mine? And yet, he's thrown a fit over such a tiny little thing? Makes him seem a bit irrational and emotive.
Wrong. Libs want libs to be the ones who decide what are lies, fake news, baseless conspiracy theories, and racist and bigoted speech.No, Jefferson. Libs want lies, fake news, baseless conspiracy theories, and racist and bigoted speech moderated.
Of course it's a right on this forum.
If you want to put someone on ignore then you have the right to do so, non mods at least.
Your right, your prerogative.
If anna or anyone else holding differing political beliefs to the self advertised conservatism on here wanted an echo chamber then they wouldn't post here, they'd go to a forum that reflected solely their own.
You seem to be more miffed that anna has chosen not to engage with you anymore
and you're hardly the core of this forum are you?
Snowflakes are running out of safe places to hide from conservative opinions.Then why your bizarre comment about "lying little snowflakes running out of places to hide" Jefferson?
Uh huh. Well, you have the...say so...in putting someone on ignore here. Or not. You have the absolute freedom to do that.I don't know what (if anything) you mean by calling something a "right," because your thinking is immoral and irrational. People like you and bananahead, who call (among other evils) murdering babies a "right," are not people capable of rationally using, or thinking rationally about your use of the word, "right". But, like I said, the freedom to which you are referring is, indeed, a freedom. And, like I asked you: Who claimed anything to the contrary?
I have the freedom to do so. Remember, not every freedom is a right.
Supra.
Bananahead's echo chamber is with her 24/7, I assure you. Same as how yours is with you.
But bananahead's never engaged with me, so I don't know what you mean by "anymore".
I'm just some guy, really. Is there a core of this forum? I'd never heard of that till now. To whom or what are you referring as "the core of this forum"?
Uh huh. Well, you have the...say so...in putting someone on ignore here. Or not. You have the absolute freedom to do that.
Oh dear....Snowflakes are running out of safe places to hide from conservative opinions.
Never mind. You go on imagining and convincing yourself what folk like me and anna believe and all that.Your point? Who stated anything to the contrary?
AND... they want to define what that means. THAT is the problem.No, Jefferson. Libs want lies, fake news, baseless conspiracy theories, and racist and bigoted speech moderated.
Has Donald Trump suddenly become a "lib", cos "fake news" was his feeble little mantra and it didn't do him much good did it?Wrong. Libs want libs to be the ones who decide what are lies, fake news, baseless conspiracy theories, and racist and bigoted speech.
Never mind. You go on imagining and convincing yourself what folk like me and anna believe and all that.
Trump's definition was anything that in any way whatsoever disagreed with him, apart from his food possibly...AND... they want to define what that means. THAT is the problem.
Hey, you made some pompous post about folk putting other folk on ignore and you were called on it. Nowt wrong with it so get on with your usual and stop going on about it. It's up to poster discretion so change the record.IOW, you had no point in telling me that TOL members have the freedom to put other TOL members on "ignore". Thanks, Captain, for yet another factoid everyone already knew.
It's not easy for the millions who are addicted to social media. It's harder than trying to quit smoking for them.Oh dear....
It's pretty easy to 'hide' from anyone's opinions on the media front Jefferson.
Are you addicted to social media? Cos otherwise most of it hardly revolves around conservatism besides specialist platforms.It's not easy for the millions who are addicted to social media. It's harder than trying to quit smoking for them.