You bring several biased allegations against her, accusing her of supporting credible allegations you falsely claim have been irrefutably proven to have been false. And yet you admit that she has admitted herself she was wrong if an allegation or story has been proven false. You can not condemn someone for believing stories that have never been proven false even if others falsely claim those stories have been proven beyond doubt to have been false.
MTG
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
Which of those allegations do you consider to be "credible"? QAnon? Pizzagate? False flag mass shootings? Is it 9/11 perhaps? 9/11 was done by Republicans.
I admit I don't know the details of any of those items but it would not surprise me if some people were misled by reports which turned out to be wrong. Look at how many millions of Americans were wrong for so many years about the Trump/Russian collusion narratives promoted by the lying leftist democrat party.
And yet you called them "credible"? You don't even know what you're talking about. As usual.
I will give stories the benefit of the doubt when leftist partisans claim the stories are false but do not make any effort to prove the stories false.
Right Divider
Body part
They're trying to be as bad as Democrats?
They're trying--and succeeding--to be even worse than the Democrats!
Right Divider
Body part
I highly doubt that they can be worse then Democrats.
Re
Republicans who disrespect and displease God are just as evil as democrats and everyone else who disrespects and displeases God.
Then why are you a Republican?
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
They aren't "allegations", this is the whacked out stuff that she's touted, fact. That she apologized for her pathetic remarks on one topic doesn't undo the rest of her ridiculous rubbish. She is a loon, pure and simple.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
So, you don't know the details and the reports have already been provided to you. But hey, she's not a 'democrat' so anything she says goes, right?
Derf
Well-known member
She is female. When females make an accusation, you're supposed to believe it, unless it is about a democrat.
Well you're certainly not supposed to believe it if it's about a Republican.
Derf
Well-known member
Then when DO we believe a woman's accusations?
On December 19, 2017, Gaetz was the only representative to vote against the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act, a bill allocating additional government resources to help combat human trafficking...On February 27, 2018, Gaetz voted against the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, which had by then been combined with the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act. It passed, 388–25...On April 2, 2021...his communications director, Luke Ball, and his legislative director, Devin Murphy, resigned...In the evening on April 8, Representative Adam Kinzinger tweeted that Gaetz should resign...
Matt Gaetz - Wikipedia
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
She is? Wow, didn't know that...Of course where it comes to what people say, both male and female then it depends on what they're actually saying and whether it's loony or not. In the case of MTG, she's nuts.
Derf
Well-known member
Was that an allegation? Are you suggesting an arrest, conviction, and sentencing based on that allegation? What's your point?On December 19, 2017, Gaetz was the only representative to vote against the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act, a bill allocating additional government resources to help combat human trafficking...On February 27, 2018, Gaetz voted against the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, which had by then been combined with the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act. It passed, 388–25...On April 2, 2021...his communications director, Luke Ball, and his legislative director, Devin Murphy, resigned...In the evening on April 8, Representative Adam Kinzinger tweeted that Gaetz should resign...
Matt Gaetz - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
If Matt Gaetz was involved in human trafficking, it is kidnapping, and the biblical punishment is death. Resignation wouldn't be needed in such case. If Matt Gaetz was involved in sexual predation and rape, those, too, are capital crimes, and resignation is unnecessary. What you are asking, if I understand you correctly, is for someone you consider to be an indecent man to do the decent thing and resign. But nowhere does the bible ever talk about resigning, afaik. And resigning would not make a kidnapper or rapist a decent man--I hope you agree with me here.
Unfortunately, our nation doesn't have a fixed and understandable moral code, but a bunch of shifting rules on what is criminal this year or not. And that's mostly because, like those who have psychological problems often become shrinks, criminals often become lawmakers.
I have no idea whether Matt Gaetz ought to resign or be executed or just stay in office, but if resignation is the standard self-applied penalty, perhaps someone should be looking at Gaetz's comm. director and leg. director.
On December 19, 2017, Gaetz was the only representative to vote against the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act, a bill allocating additional government resources to help combat human trafficking...On February 27, 2018, Gaetz voted against the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, which had by then been combined with the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act. It passed, 388–25...On April 2, 2021...his communications director, Luke Ball, and his legislative director, Devin Murphy, resigned...In the evening on April 8, Representative Adam Kinzinger tweeted that Gaetz should resign...
Matt Gaetz - Wikipedia
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
Democrats craft horrible bills with smooth-sounding titles to deceive the gullible into thinking the bills are all good. Good bills from democrats are rare, but bad bills with appealing names are a dime a dozen. I don't listen to leftists who criticize conservatives for opposing a bad bill with a deceptive name, especially if those leftist agitators do not say why someone opposed the bill.
Derf
Well-known member
Of course you didn't. That's because you think such things are fluid--just like laws. And just like looniness. Homosexuality used to be a type of psychological problem, along with gender disphoria, but instead, you now don't even know whether a woman is female or not.
You tell me which is more nuts.