Don't you have some questions to answer over in the southern redneck inbred thread that you created Willy Billy Jim Bob?
I don't answer to ghetto dwellers, Buckwheat.
Don't you have some questions to answer over in the southern redneck inbred thread that you created Willy Billy Jim Bob?
I don't answer to ghetto dwellers, Buckwheat.
I see Willy Billy Jim Bob is back after a full day of sloppin the hogs.
Crack open one of them thar Billy Beers and join in on the conversation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I've made my point twice with Dinesh D’Sousa's statement about sexual immorality and abortion, yet you won't acknowledge it (of course not, it would mean defeating a lifestyle that Ralphie defends).
Oh, you mean this answer?
"Yes, women shouldn't be slutty. Do I get my pro-life badge now?"
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2965970&postcount=155
Gee, that's a tough one. You support (not support, "worship") a Libertarian who doesn't think that homosexuality is a sin, voted to allow homosexuals into the military, and doesn't think anything is wrong with homosexuals marrying.
:hammer:You want laws against incest and bestiality enforced, but not laws against homosexuality.
I can point out dozens of posts that you've made against abortion, but not one supporting traditional morality (anti pornography, anti homosexual behavior, support of traditional marriage).
Laws against bestiality and incest exist in the US. Therefore, the should be enforced. What laws against homosexuality? With no law there is no enforcement...
Fallacious argument; argument from silence. Learn proper debate.
Gee Ralphie, if you were to ask me to provide posts promoting traditional morality, i.e. exposing the homosexual agenda, exposing the abortion movement, exposing the pornography movement, or even talking about the fraud behind the religion of Islam, I wouldn't fall back on "fallacious argument; argument from silence. Learn proper debate",
I would have PROVIDED THEM. But then, when there's nothing to provide in the way of proof...
Not everyone rants quite like you do. Your argument from silence is just as fallacious as it was 5 minutes ago.
Unless I can find evidence of a person condemning something, that means they condone it, is this your new "logic"?
Your ignorance has reached new heights.
Congrats lain:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...on-birth-control-social-issues_n_1284176.html
There are signs that he is on the right page.
I've made my point twice with Dinesh D’Sousa's statement about sexual immorality and abortion, yet you won't acknowledge it (of course not, it would mean defeating a lifestyle that Ralphie defends).
One sentence, two lies. New record?
Congrats lain:
Speaking of leftist pro baby killing/pro sodomites.
Contain sexual immorality and you'll contain abortion.
You were exposed as a pro life fraud long ago, I'll be taking a step further to expose you and others like you soon.
I've made my point twice with Dinesh D’Sousa's statement about sexual immorality and abortion, yet you won't acknowledge it
(of course not, it would mean defeating a lifestyle that Ralphie defends).
Who is? Once you start lying, you just can't stop, can you?
I don't want to see abortion "contained", I want to see it criminalized.
I've made my point twice with Dinesh D’Sousa's statement about sexual immorality and abortion, yet you won't acknowledge it
(of course not, it would mean defeating a lifestyle that Ralphie defends).
One sentence, two lies. New record?
Congrats lain:
Why do you humor this freak?
Honestly WoZ, you're a complete glutton for punishment. Stop feeding the troll.
Just calling him out for lying as you currently are in another thread. I guess that make two of us
Notice it shut him up in this thread. He backs himself into a corner and then does his vanishing act. Yes, it's edifying.
One step at a time, alaCarte:
Did I acknowledge it, yes or no?
Offer an example of my defending whatever lifestyle it is that you're referring to.
Quote me. Your argument from silence is fallacious; you should stop using it. If I have defended something, you must have evidence of my defending it.
It's time for you to:
A) Put up
B) Shut up
C) Admit you lied twice in one sentence.
I used the term "ala carte Christianity" some time ago. Why do you feel the need to copy a term that I brought to TOL?
You made some sexist reference to "slutty women", hardly "acknowledging" the problem behind sexual immorality.
Your Christian-hating moral relativism is shown throughout the threads of TOL, from the Founding Fathers thread to the Libertarian thread.
You can deny it all you want, I don't need to prove it, as it's more than obvious.