I wonder what's the over/under on glory dehydrating before the night is over? :think:
I wonder what's the over/under on glory dehydrating before the night is over? :think:
:rotfl:He's dying of curiosity....or he's lying through his teeth and reading every word I write. :think:
It could go either way....just like he does. :chuckle:
Only one time on this: if you're going to take her off the invisible chain I'll just have to add you to it. Completely your choice.:rotfl:
Only one time on this: if you're going to take her off the invisible chain I'll just have to add you to it. Completely your choice.
On the plus side, she's underscoring my point about her.
So that gets you the one pass.
I'd say I'm going to give ol glory the last word, but that's like saying you'd give Marlon Brando the last piece of chicken in the bucket.
It's a peculiar place. Helps if you read the OP though, contextually. CS didn't get that one (and the prohibition is against name calling without reason).Hmm, there are definitely some "interesting" thoughts on this thread:/
While I rarely engage in name calling on an artless level, the volume of posts of late so dense that not even thought can appear to escape them demands some form of recognition and, after a fashion, feint, sardonic praise.
So here it is...just when you thought it couldn't get any more clearly, tragically moronic, up steps TSF to the plate with a shot to (and out of) left field that might never come down.
Then you're an even bigger moron. So congrats on MOTD honors. :first:...they said Mark Furman was a racist... but hey, i personally dont think calling someone N... is racist...
It was a tight--wait for it--race. lain:
The floor is yours. Mop at will. :e4e:
You really could have stopped after "read" from what I've read of your non-efforts at supporting wild charge and declaration after wild charge and declaration.I don't read dishonest agenda driven propaganda.
You're the rhetorical equivalent of a coward, CS. You don't back your claims and you run from facts. Or you hide behind statements like the first bit of nonsense.That's why I don't read the New Yorker and I don't read anything you write to me that's doesn't directly answer at least one of my questions in a straightforward manner by the end of a ten line paragraph.
Who can or should take your seriously?