Michelle Obama Is A Woman

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
Again, you seem to have punctuation problems, along with reality really. Why are you lying about this woman?
Nope, you’re the one with reality problems. You are trying to convince those who have not drank the iibtard kool aide that a man is a woman.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Joan Rivers, in a moment of candor, casually mentioned that Michelle was a tranny. She was clearly not joking. Rivers was a very good friend of the Obama's and would never do anything to hurt them. She was in her 80s and probably not thinking too clearly. Older people often lose their "should I say this" filter.

 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
Oh dear........ the bigotry.

I have noticed that those who appear to be most 'outraged' by transgender issues, or homosexuality, etc....... can turn out to be very dishonest closet Gays.

You.....? Possibly....?

'Methinks he doth protest too much!'
You have not noticed anything. You do exactly as all those that promote evil as good , which is you accuse anyone of participating in the evil they are exposing. Your loss.
 

eider

Well-known member
You have not noticed anything. You do exactly as all those that promote evil as good , which is you accuse anyone of participating in the evil they are exposing. Your loss.
That is your perception of what the truth is.
Unfortunately you believe that everything you do is good and holy, I guess.
I can't help you.
Michelle Obama is a very fine person and anybody who would believe that she is evil is deranged.
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
That is your perception of what the truth is.
Unfortunately you believe that everything you do is good and holy, I guess.
I can't help you.
Michelle Obama is a very fine person and anybody who would believe that she is evil is deranged.
I don’t have to condemn anyone God has already condemned same sex.
 

eider

Well-known member
I don’t have to condemn anyone God has already condemned same sex.
I don't believe that for today.
You're thinking of millennia ago when defence against infection was a very serious issue. Even certain foods had to be banned. Even rooftop protection was absolute law. The people had to grow in strength and no diminishment was acceptable. The Israelites had to win every time against every foe.

Times have changed.
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
I don't believe that for today.
You're thinking of millennia ago when defence against infection was a very serious issue. Even certain foods had to be banned. Even rooftop protection was absolute law. The people had to grow in strength and no diminishment was acceptable. The Israelites had to win every time against every foe.

Times have changed.
While times may change God does not. What God decreed sin was sin then and is still sin now.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
I don't believe that for today.
You're thinking of millennia ago when defence against infection was a very serious issue.

God's enduring command against homosexuality has nothing to do with defence against infection, except in that it inherently deters such infections from occurring.

Or do you assert that infection isn't a serious problem anymore, and that diseases like AIDS aren't a mainly homosexual-only disease?

Even certain foods had to be banned.

For what reason were the foods banned, Eider?

Even rooftop protection was absolute law.

Considering that in ancient times (and even in modern times, especially with such buildings as apartment complexes), the rooftop was part of the living space where people frequently went, it makes sense that there would be a law regarding walls around roofs, in the same way that there would be a law addressing having someone accidentally being injured after falling into a hole you dig.

But most houses today, people don't normally walk on their roofs, because unlike the houses in ancient times, the roofs today are sloped to facilitate rainwater drainage, whereas the buildings in the past were flat.

The people had to grow in strength and no diminishment was acceptable. The Israelites had to win every time against every foe.

And yet, as far as I can remember, they lost more times than they won, because of their rebellion against and disobedience to God.

Times have changed.

And yet, the Law remains.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Because you drank at the libtard well doesn’t mean everyone has. It isn’t a lie Michelle is actually Michael.
Hmm, then supply verifiable proof that can actually be corroborated by credible sources. Ya know, stuff like non wingnut sites and pathetic little photos. If you've got that then bring it to the table. Otherwise, you're a loon who buys into anything that handily fits into his confirmation bias. Nothing new and I sure wouldn't want to drink whatever you're consuming...
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
Hmm, then supply verifiable proof that can actually be corroborated by credible sources. Ya know, stuff like non wingnut sites and pathetic little photos. If you've got that then bring it to the table. Otherwise, you're a loon who buys into anything that handily fits into his confirmation bias. Nothing new and I sure wouldn't want to drink whatever you're consuming...
I got it you cannot believe or trust own eyes as you make allowances for depravity and perversion.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I got it you cannot believe or trust own eyes as you make allowances for depravity and perversion.
Um, no, I'm just not interested in nutball lunacy. Again, provide credible proof for your assertions or carry on promulgating bunk. Up to you. If you actually care about truth then get on with delivering some.
 

eider

Well-known member
While times may change God does not. What God decreed sin was sin then and is still sin now.
So...... apart from the sacrificial laws and rules 507 OT laws remain.
Do you keep to them all?
I expect that you don't actually know many of them.
 

eider

Well-known member
God's enduring command against homosexuality has nothing to do with defence against infection, except in that it inherently deters such infections from occurring.
I feel quite sure that it did.
Or do you assert that infection isn't a serious problem anymore, and that diseases like AIDS aren't a mainly homosexual-only disease?
I don't know the statistics but illnesses and operations that require transfusions account for many cases.

For what reason were the foods banned, Eider?
Protection against the transmission of infection and disease.
Considering that in ancient times (and even in modern times, especially with such buildings as apartment complexes), the rooftop was part of the living space where people frequently went, it makes sense that there would be a law regarding walls around roofs, in the same way that there would be a law addressing having someone accidentally being injured after falling into a hole you dig.

But most houses today, people don't normally walk on their roofs, because unlike the houses in ancient times, the roofs today are sloped to facilitate rainwater drainage, whereas the buildings in the past were flat.
Where I live there is still a law that all flat roofing where anybody might be for any reason has to be protected by railings, fences or brick walls.
But not where you live?

And yet, as far as I can remember, they lost more times than they won, because of their rebellion against and disobedience to God.
Not in the earliest times........ because they were stronger...... because they kept all the laws.
You see? But you don't, do you?
And yet, the Law remains.
No..... it doesn't.
Like many others that you suggest are not needed any more, that one isn't.

And this thread is about hatred branding innocent people like 1st Lady Obama as a transgender because they hate her and transgender-ism, therefore tie two hatreds together. That's not just a lie, it's wicked.
 
Top