No, not for the purpose of this topic. I simply am asking anyone who believes that the crucifixion took place on the 6th day of the week and who thinks that the "heart of the earth" is referring to the tomb and who tries to explain the lack of a 3rd night by saying that the Messiah was using common figure of speech/colloquial language, to provide actual examples/instances to support the assertion of common usage.
That is the one and only issue of this topic, i.e., the commonality of saying that a daytime or a night time was forecast or said to be involved with an event when no part of a daytime or no part of a night time could have occurred.
I have not found any justification for the claim that "three days and three nights" is a common figure of speech for part of one day, a night, another day, another night, and a possible part of a third day.
Nor have I found any justification for the claim that Jesus was buried for three days and three nights in contradiction of His statement that He would "rise on the third day."
Was Jesus correct when He said He would spend "three days and three nights" in the earth or was Jesus correct when He said He would "rise on the third day"?
Can these two contradictory statements be reconciled through debate?
The only reason I can see for debating the issue of whether "three days and three nights" is correct or whether "rise on the third day" is correct is to cast doubt on the reality of the crucifixion and resurrection.
According to the earliest written records, the early Christians taught that the crucifixion took place on the sixth day of the week (now called Friday) and the resurrection took place on the first day of the week (now called Sunday).
If you think otherwise, please provide documented evidence that the early Christians believed that Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday and was raised from the dead at sunset on the following Saturday.