whitestone
Well-known member
oh come on we made Washington d.c. legal and look at all the side affects it has had,,,
oh come on we made Washington d.c. legal and look at all the side affects it has had,,,
Did they make it legal or simply decriminalize it, like in California?
not sure,lol,,,the morticians of America foundation snuck it in under the "healthy living act",,back in 84,,,
The Church would speak against it simply because it is mind altering- it is not in their nature to uphold anything sinful, even if it's a better alternative.
Alcohol has many negative attributes that simply doesn't exist with marijuana. For example, spousal/child abuse in the household is typically due to alcoholism.
Another thing, on the health side of it, is that alcohol is exponentially more detrimental to one's health:
it destroys the liver, it has an extreme rate of dependence, blows out the pancreas, is a gateway to depression and anxiety, and a myriad of other things.
I mean, alcohol can destroy a person's life; marijuana on the other hand, if legal, does not.
The majority of all suicides are done under the influence of alcohol_
There's simply a lot wrong with the fact that alcohol is legal and marijuana, which has never involved any of these things, is scrutinized.
But it's also inevitable that alcohol would be the substance of choice- it's the historical alteration. Anyone the world over can simply ferment fruit or grain, and that's what they did. It served as something that was clean and wouldn't spoil, and would take the edge off of hard living.
In conclusion, the only reason alcohol is legal and marijuana is not is out of demand- there's no reason to single either one out, it's just that society has always been more inclined culturally to one and not the other.
But if society were smart, I tell you- make marijuana legal, but don't recommend it, and campaign against alcoholism. That's the ticket.
Toke away. Seriously, I won't lift a finger to stop you.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/01/29/smoking-one-joint-is-equivalent-to-20-cigarettes-study-says/
That's a bogus study. There are thousands more that say otherwise.
Of course it is Doper.
Tell us again why you use a vaporizer instead of a bong or a joint
If you didn't cherry pick minority studies that fit your ideals maybe you'd actually influence people. I've yet to see anyone change their thinking to start agreeing with you on any of your big government topics.
As Brian Williams once said, "If you wait long enough a study will eventually come out that supports your particular way of life."
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Of course it is [a bogus study] Doper.
Tell us again why you use a vaporizer instead of a bong or a joint
I guess I missed your answer as to why you use a sissy vaporizer to ingest your dope instead of being a real doper and holding it in your lungs by using a bong or joint?
It's not harmful to do so, as "thousands" (of studies) say so.
Keep in mind that marijuana has been a controlled substance (i.e. illegal) up until somewhat recently. With the legalization of marijuana and hence increased consumption, I have no doubt that we'll be seeing the many harmful effects that it does to not only the individual smoking it, but to the society that has legalized it.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3958731&postcount=490
Not only marijuana but ALL drugs were legal prior to 1914.
I am not going to start smoking marijuana if it is legalized for the same reason that I don't smoke cigarettes now. Its completely legal for me to do so, but I still don't want smoke in my lungs or to get hooked onto an addicting drug. I also don't want to arrest people for doing stupid stuff like smoking cigarettes.
Marijuana is similar.
You've got a buddy who knows his dope. How interesting.
Shouldn't you be out arresting gays and throwing them in prison or something?
Thank you for showing that marijuana is an addicting drug Jr.
BTW: I was talking to a buddy that works security at one of the many medical marijuana dispensaries here in the Puget Sound area (with all of that drug money on hand, they worry about other dopers robbing them).
He said that the cost of a graham of dope at a dispensary is between $15-$20. The cost of a graham of dope at one of the new recreational marijuana stores is around $25. He said that you can buy the same dope on the street for $10.
So much for the black market going away after legalization.
The prices will drop. In CO the price per gram is as low as 7 dollars. You won't find it that cheap on the street.
Because it smells less and uses less, thus saving me money. You know, common sense reasons.
That's odd, because government taxes are a huge part of the cost of legal dope.
From the OP: TAXES: Nobody knows how and at what level to tax pot. Too low, and the states won't be able to afford intense regulatory supervision of the industry. Too high, and pot users may stay in the black market.
In response to an earlier post of yours:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Tell us again why you use a vaporizer instead of a bong or a joint
I guess I missed your answer as to why you use a sissy vaporizer to ingest your dope instead of being a real doper and holding it in your lungs by using a bong or joint?
It's not harmful to do so, as "thousands" (of studies) say so.
That's a new one: Marijuana smells bad.
I can understand with your addiction and all that you'd want to get more bang for your buck. Not being familiar with sissy vaporizers, wouldn't it be similar to trying to get a nicotine high by sitting in a room full of smokers and ingesting 2nd hand smoke? A couple of tokes off a pipe or a bong wouldn't be too expensive (unless you're doing it 20 times a day, which I suspect pot addicts do) and would go straight into the system, hence less waste.
Well, I get medical tax discount. Rec is a bit more expensive because of extra taxes.
It's not a bad smell, just strong.
A vaporizer is not like a room humidifier. It still has a tube that you inhale through. It's just that you get only the vapors and no smoke. It's a nicer taste too. The vapors are formed by pulling the heat through the plant (when inhaling) thus all the THC through the tube instead of some of it just burning away into the air. When that happens less is required.