don't start a rep war
she is the best at it
Nah, this isn't about rep, but rather baiting. Tam isn't taking the bait because she is honest and intelligent enough to see this for what it is.
don't start a rep war
she is the best at it
Time was that advocating beating a woman to death aka Trad would not only have landed the poster in the ban box but anyone agreeing with it.
There was a poster here a few years ago called 'Benjamin' who actually started a thread asking whether it was okay to beat up his wife and was universally told 'no' and he was booted off this place.
How times change eh?
Argumentum ad populum, Trad? Say it ain't so.
The problem isn't Arthur's, the problem is yours.
You said the words, now you have to live with them. They're part of your identity now.
Argumentum ad populum, Trad? Say it ain't so.
It's actually not an argumentum ad populum. I'm not saying that what I am saying is true because "most people think so." I'm actually making an argument to authority, oddly enough, appealing to the "authority" of Kmoney and Elo, where Kmoney and Elo are cited as arguments on what is consistent with or contrary to basic, common sensibilities/tastefulness.
Now? You are too generous.
You're splitting fallacies.
The words are yours, Trad. Your advocation for the beating in of a wife's face until she's dead (purely as argument, of course) won't be forgotten.
You're splitting fallacies.
The words are yours, Trad. Your advocation for the beating in of a wife's face until she's dead (purely as argument, of course) won't be forgotten.
Now? You are too generous.
I'll never forget.
I have no doubt that back in the days of the caveman, such behavior was seen a normal.
|
Er, no. You and the other supposed Christians here, who are supposed to reflect the 'fruits of the spirit' are doing just what here exactly? Paying service to one of the most insincere threads from the forum troll and just having fun with it at anybody's expense. Considering that Tam has been a rape victim it's just insidious that this is getting a pass. Still, as long as you're getting your self righteous fun then who cares eh?
What a bunch of tossers.
Funny, just yesterday I was pondering that idea. My feeling is that cavemen were likely not wife beaters and rapists. It seems to go against natural survival instincts, imo. Notice these modern men are justifying wife beating and rape with their interpretation of religious texts. The problem, as I see it, is false religious doctrines and black hearts, not devolution. The golden rule is so simple even a caveman can follow it.
Funny, just yesterday I was pondering that idea. My feeling is that cavemen were likely not wife beaters and rapists. It seems to go against natural survival instincts, imo. Notice these modern men are justifying wife beating and rape with their interpretation of religious texts. The problem, as I see it, is false religious doctrines and black hearts, not devolution. The golden rule is so simple even a caveman can follow it.
I am controlling it! Your ears would be singed if I were not. :banned:
He is not apologizing. He is sneering at his opposition.
Elo. has disagreed even with my basic theses, but only by saying: "Because God said so." Ask him if you doubt this.
I see the problem as these males of whom we are speaking wishing to change the meaning of the Bible in order to conform it with their own views.