• This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.

Mainstream Science

Avajs

Active member
That magnetic striping is more pronounced at the surface is a fact that if you didn't know it, you haven't looked into the topic. And you aren't the one that determines how much doubt about a narrative someone can have based on the facts. Thus, it's up to you to bring evidence that makes your point.

Show us your evidence for magnetic striping and sea floor spreading.
Well, sorry, since the "main stream science" accepts sea floor spreading and uses magnetic striping as one of the bits of evidence, I think I'll wait for you to provide the "facts or logical doubts". Maybe you are correct, but I've never seen any evidence to support your position.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Well, sorry, since the "main stream science" accepts sea floor spreading and uses magnetic striping as one of the bits of evidence,

Appeals to popularity are logical fallacies.

Don't use logical fallacies to prop up your position.

I think I'll wait for you to provide the "facts or logical doubts".

Reminder, the ball is in your court to provide evidence for your position, see post #39.

Maybe you are correct,

But you won't test it.... why?

but I've never seen any evidence to support your position.

Another fallacy: Appeal to incredulity.

Is all you have logical fallacies?
 

Avajs

Active member
Someone was a poser from the start...
Uh, no. Even you know what those scientists who actually are involved in the study of plate tectonics/sea floor spreading take as evidence for their theories. You are the one raising questions. You therefore must have studied the issue as well and have evidence to support your objection. Let's hear it.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Uh, no. Even you know what those scientists who actually are involved in the study of plate tectonics/sea floor spreading take as evidence for their theories.
SFS is NOT evidence... it is a bogus THEORY about the evidence.
The mid-Atlantic ridge is much more likely to be tension cracks. The evidence supports that far better than SFS.
You are the one raising questions.
What a concept!
You therefore must have studied the issue as well and have evidence to support your objection. Let's hear it.
Again, it is YOUR claim that SFS occurs. YOU made that claim and have YET to provide ANY support for it.

Watch some of Bryan Nickel's videos on YouTube. He gives some very good presentations of Dr. Walt Brown's HydroPlate Theory:

 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Ah, are you unaware of the magnetic striping?
Now, that runs along the border of the mythical, sunken land of Creditcartha, which borders the kingdom of Agartha, right? Didn't they Discover it back during the war, while going under water with debth charges, in the Chase for U-boats?
 

Avajs

Active member
Now, that runs along the border of the mythical, sunken land of Creditcartha, which borders the kingdom of Agartha, right? Didn't they Discover it back during the war, while going under water with debth charges, in the Chase for U-boats?
Sounds about right from your side of the looking glass
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Sounds about right from your side of the looking glass
Wait...have you and I talked before? Oh, I know what it is; it's that the way you write, you sound quite a bit like @Arthur Brain. Weird. In fact, so far as I can find using TOL's search feature as best I know how, you're the first person since @Arthur Brain to have used that "sounds about right..." form of sarcasm:
Sounds about right for this thread...
Interesting.
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
But you did not supply any "facts or logical doubts" so a bit hard to evaluate
There again, interestingly, your writing is peculiarly similar to a certain habit featured often in @Arthur Brain's writing. Your technically grammatically-incomplete "so..." clause is what caught my eye. Instead of "so it is a bit hard to evaluate", you cut corners by writing "so a bit hard to evaluate". @Arthur Brain does that a lot, too:
The info about Ballard abruptly leaving the organisation is available elsewhere so hardly exclusive to Wapo anyway...
"so hardly exclusive to Wapo anyway..."

instead of

"so it's hardly exclusive to Wapo anyway..."
Well, Trumps just far up his own self so neither right or left in any meaningful sense.
"so neither right or left in any meaningful sense"

instead of

"so he is neither right or left in any meaningful sense"
Already provided links as to the supposed veracity of this film already so all there to see
"so all there to see"

instead of

"so they are all there to see"
Then again, I'm conversing with someone who seems to think Trump is still president so kinda funny...
"so kinda funny..."

instead of

"so that is kinda funny..."

Don't you find that interesting, @Avajs?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Wow, it reminds me of years back when 'serpentdove' used to go about this place accusing other long established forum members of being other people. Was bonkers as all get out but she even seemed to think that kmoney was Count Iblis among others. The irony being that I actually had a sock account at the time as I was banned under my username and she didn't cotton on....I also started a thread on her nuttiness, admitted to the founder of the forum that I'd been using a different account and invited a ban should Knight wish to enforce one. He didn't. Still, that was when this place was properly run and had some meaningful traffic on it.

Soz to burst this little bubble of yours Djengo but Avajs is nowt to do with me!
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Wow, it reminds me of years back when 'serpentdove' used to go about this place accusing other long established forum members of being other people. Was bonkers as all get out but she even seemed to think that kmoney was Count Iblis among others. The irony being that I actually had a sock account at the time as I was banned under my username and she didn't cotton on....I also started a thread on her nuttiness, admitted to the founder of the forum that I'd been using a different account and invited a ban should Knight wish to enforce one. He didn't. Still, that was when this place was properly run and had some meaningful traffic on it.

Soz to burst this little bubble of yours Djengo but Avajs is nowt to do with me!
No bubble bursted. Wait...don't you have me on "ignore"?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
No bubble bursted. Wait...don't you have me on "ignore"?
Well, that's cool then! Just, ya know, think things through a bit more before you make such absurd leaps of the imagination...

Obviously not, but as anyone should know, it's the prerogative of any user to put other users on the ole ignore list and remove them from it as they see fit. Ya do know that, right?
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Well, that's cool then!
Yep. Didn't ask.
Just, ya know, think things through a bit more before you make such absurd leaps of the imagination...
What "leaps of the imagination"? Your leaps of imagination, such as that subtle details of coincidence in literary habit (such as I documented above) are not at least suspicious, you person who has operated more than one TOL account?
Obviously not
False. Not obviously not.
it's the prerogative of any user to put other users on the ole ignore list and remove them from it as they see fit.
Did I say it's not? No. I did not. So, what's your "point"? What you pointlessly recited there is true, and is as irrelevant as pointing out that it's the prerogative of any user to underscore, embolden, and/or italicize any text as they see fit.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Yep. Didn't ask.

What "leaps of the imagination"? Your leaps of imagination, such as that subtle details of coincidence in literary habit (such as I documented above) are not at least suspicious, you person who has operated more than one TOL account?

False. Not obviously not.

Did I say it's not? No. I did not. So, what's your "point"? What you pointlessly recited there is true, and is as irrelevant as pointing out that it's the prerogative of any user to underscore, embolden, and/or italicize any text as they see fit.
Oh, ya got me dude, I'm Avajis or whatever. Your powers of deduction where it comes to nothing really in particular are beyond dispute!
 
Top