glorydaz
Well-known member
No, not really, just not into the idea of assaulting people. Do you condone Trump's admissions, you think his comments were all okay?
I'm really not into locking people up for free speech. This is America.
No, not really, just not into the idea of assaulting people. Do you condone Trump's admissions, you think his comments were all okay?
See what he tried to do there?
Trump didn't talk about wanting to grope or assault anyone (see how AB subtly conflates them?) As pointed out, Trump was speaking of - let's be honest - sluts and whores who will let a man do so IF that man is rich and powerful...as Trump put it, "a star." That is a fact and has ALWAYS been a fact.
But AB is so stupid that he doesn't think you'll notice his infantile attempt at rhetorical slight of hand.
I only saw him because you quoted him. He's not worth reading in real time.
Only the ones that commit sexual misconduct.
Having sex with anyone but the one you are married to is sexual misconduct.
So, yes, absolutely, lock them up.
Let's get serious about sexual misconduct.
Only the ones that commit sexual misconduct.
Having sex with anyone but the one you are married to is sexual misconduct.
So, yes, absolutely, lock them up.
Let's get serious about sexual misconduct.
You STILL don't understand a word I say.
Let's put in on the legal books once and for all that all sexual misconduct is to be a crime punishable by (at the very least) jail time.
Let's get serious about it and stop beating around the bush.
Let's rid every community of it, and not just the political community.
Until then any sexual deviant can be President just as it was in the days of Jefferson.
Get serious or cherry-pick?????
What to do, what to do?
He boasted about being able to grab women by the genitals and the video is there for anyone to hear, as are many others where commentators and lawyers (Yes, I know lawyer is kinda a cuss word for you) have described his comments and admissions as nothing short of sexual assault. Go report the thread if you want, but given that Sherman seemed okay with me starting this one after being kicked off GM's then so much for free speech around these parts if this one gets closed.
It is not a lie to point out that Trump self admittedly claims and boasts about being able to grope women.
So, then yes, you're pretty much for locking up most of America and the Western world then. Okaaaaay.
So, let's have a far right Theocratic state then.
Live in a land of freedom and liberty or elect a puritan who hasn't committed a sexual misdemeanor worthy of being a felony?
:freak:
See what he tried to do there?
Trump didn't talk about wanting to grope or assault anyone (see how AB subtly conflates them?) As pointed out, Trump was speaking of - let's be honest - sluts and whores who will let a man do so IF that man is rich and powerful...as Trump put it, "a star." That is a fact and has ALWAYS been a fact.
But AB is so stupid that he doesn't think you'll notice his infantile attempt at rhetorical slight of hand.
I only saw him because you quoted him. He's not worth reading in real time.
He boasted about being able to grab women by the genitals [WHO LET YOU WHEN YOU'RE A STAR] and the video is there for anyone to hear,
He took the bait and swam off with it in his mouth.
He took the bait and swam off with it in his mouth.
I don't believe how stupid he is, doubling down on idiocy. Let's correct it for him, from his own video.
He's either drunk or a Soviet bot.
He's flailing, furiously flipping through the script for buzzwords to post. Theocratic...puritan...yeah, he's legit all right (my foot). He'll sign off before long if the pressure keeps up.
He's flailing, furiously flipping through the script for buzzwords to post. Theocratic...puritan...yeah, he's legit all right (my foot). He'll sign off before long if the pressure keeps up.
Free speech for me, but not for thee. :rotfl:
So you are for cherry-picking instead of getting serious about sexual misconduct in all communities.So, then yes, you're pretty much for locking up most of America and the Western world then. Okaaaaay.
So, let's have a far right Theocratic state then.
Live in a land of freedom and liberty or elect a puritan who hasn't committed a sexual misdemeanor worthy of being a felony?
:freak:
So you are for cherry-picking instead of getting serious about sexual misconduct in all communities.
No surprise there.
No. They, I, and I'd hope you, would appreciate any legislation that is done over family strength and values, even if said person doesn't espouse them himself. I do remember Trump saying he wanted to be right with God during his candidacy. I do remember him saying he apologized to his wife, first, and then to the public. It doesn't matter if nobody else recalls that or watched that in the news. I heard it. It is enough.The religious right seems to just love him. So yes, they certainly do.
An embarrassment like Clinton's for example? While his indiscretions are obvious and troublesome (as were JFK's), people are also concerned whether they listen to those who they represent and if they support them. Character bashing? In the end 'what' they did in office for the American people is the more important. That said, I DO want personal character in the office BUT we always seem to shoot that down. I think for example, Jimmy Carter may be a decent human being. He was a lousy president (not that I agree with his theology, he's more liberal).Does anyone really wonder what Tambora would have said, if Obama had turned out to be a sleazeball like Trump?
He wasn't a stellar individual either. Different sins. He did divide this country in half.Can you imagine the shrieks of indignation and condemnation from the religious right?
Women who LET him.It is not a lie to point out that Trump self admittedly claims and boasts about being able to grope women.
Sexual assault. :rotfl:
Sorry, Artie, only a liberal would say something like that.
It is sexual misconduct.Well, no. I don't consider people having sex outside of marriage to be a crime for a start.