How exactly are you going to accomplish this?
Liberalism is Dead and Evangelicals Don't Deserve It Anyway
- Thread starter Traditio
- Start date
- Status
How exactly are you going to accomplish this?
He deserves a merit badge for wading that far in.
lain:But really, why would anyone do that?
One of the few bright spots of the Trump presidency is its impact on how Americans appreciate...just about every other president in living memory.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Where did your "pray the rosary" signature go, Trad?
Did you trade in your Hail Mary for a Hail Victory?
Hail the ban. Long may it live.
As recently as 60 years ago, interracial marriage was still illegal in 17 states - its only been within the last 17 years that Alabama amended its state constitution to remove language prohibiting "miscegenation," and that was only by a 59/41 vote!
With the dramatic increases in social mobility, its unrealistic to think that any modern nation could exist as an "ethnostate" - its also questionable as to whether the concept of discrete "races" can be justified in the 21stC, based on genetics!
Last edited:
For anyone who may be wondering why I was banned for the past several days, it's because [MENTION=12969]Sherman[/MENTION] banned me for my reply to Kmo. where I put "JEW!" in parentheses next to a bunch of people who are, in fact, Jewish.
This was accompanied by the commentary "Knock off the antisemitic commentary."
Because, apparently, noting that people are Jewish is antisemitic and inherently objectionable.
I here post my open reply to Sherman, and to all the mods:
I tell you what. If you can give me a concrete reason for why anything that I've said is inherently objectionable, apart from "that's racist," I'll cut it out.
Otherwise, I'll talk about whatever I want.
And let's be real:
You can't. Because nothing I've said is inherently objectionable. The reason you keep banning me for "racist comment or reference" is because that's all that you've got. I haven't directly insulted anyone or engaged in otherwise objectionable behavior. I haven't even used racial slurs. You just don't like the fact that I'm speaking in racial terms.
Nothing that I've said constitutes inherently objectionable content, or otherwise content which is worthy of censorship, from a liberal perspective.
At no point have I incited violence, glorified violence, promoted violence, insulted anyone, slandered anyone, etc. In fact, I would defy you to show me a single factual claim that I've made which is even false.
I'm sorry, but simply pointing out that people who are Jewish are, in fact, Jewish, is not inherently objectionable, does not merit censorship, and does not merit banning me.
But I tell you what:
If you ban me again for "racism," or otherwise, if the previous ban hasn't been overturned, and if I haven't been given a public apology for that ridiculous and undue censorship of my speech, within a week, I will GIVE YOU a reason to ban me for racism.
I'll just start posting youtube links to Johnny Rebel songs.
How does that sound [MENTION=1373]ebenz47037[/MENTION] ?
This was accompanied by the commentary "Knock off the antisemitic commentary."
Because, apparently, noting that people are Jewish is antisemitic and inherently objectionable.
I here post my open reply to Sherman, and to all the mods:
I tell you what. If you can give me a concrete reason for why anything that I've said is inherently objectionable, apart from "that's racist," I'll cut it out.
Otherwise, I'll talk about whatever I want.
And let's be real:
You can't. Because nothing I've said is inherently objectionable. The reason you keep banning me for "racist comment or reference" is because that's all that you've got. I haven't directly insulted anyone or engaged in otherwise objectionable behavior. I haven't even used racial slurs. You just don't like the fact that I'm speaking in racial terms.
Nothing that I've said constitutes inherently objectionable content, or otherwise content which is worthy of censorship, from a liberal perspective.
At no point have I incited violence, glorified violence, promoted violence, insulted anyone, slandered anyone, etc. In fact, I would defy you to show me a single factual claim that I've made which is even false.
I'm sorry, but simply pointing out that people who are Jewish are, in fact, Jewish, is not inherently objectionable, does not merit censorship, and does not merit banning me.
But I tell you what:
If you ban me again for "racism," or otherwise, if the previous ban hasn't been overturned, and if I haven't been given a public apology for that ridiculous and undue censorship of my speech, within a week, I will GIVE YOU a reason to ban me for racism.
I'll just start posting youtube links to Johnny Rebel songs.
How does that sound [MENTION=1373]ebenz47037[/MENTION] ?
In other words:
"I can't actually beat Traditio in a one-on-one, head-to-head battle of ideas, but I don't like what he's saying. So I'll wait until he gets banned and celebrate the fact that he got censored"?
Lovely. :nono:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I wasn't here when you were posting this thread, although I wouldn't have expected you or anyone to notice. If I had been here, I certainly wouldn't have mollycoddled your racist navel-gazing.
I noticed you didn't answer the question, either. Where's your Hail Mary?
WARNING: VIDEO CONTAINS VULGAR LANGUAGE.
[MENTION=4651]kmoney[/MENTION]
For more on the rampant anti-white racism in this country, see the video below (which documents MULTIPLE cases of anti-white racism and rhetoric).
To my mind, the "It's OK to be white" flier incident really does hammer in my point.
People posted fliers in various places, and all that these fliers said is "It's OK to be white."
That is not a racist sentiment. It shouldn't even be a controversial sentiment. If you replace "white" with any other racial term, there would have been no controversy. People would have celebrated it.
But people put up fliers saying that it's OK to be white, and general public outrage ensued.
Because in our society, it's NOT OK to be white.
Our multiracial society (and by that, I mean the West in general) is a failure.
We need a white ethnostate.
The SJWs and the ethnic minorities need to leave.
[MENTION=4651]kmoney[/MENTION]
For more on the rampant anti-white racism in this country, see the video below (which documents MULTIPLE cases of anti-white racism and rhetoric).
To my mind, the "It's OK to be white" flier incident really does hammer in my point.
People posted fliers in various places, and all that these fliers said is "It's OK to be white."
That is not a racist sentiment. It shouldn't even be a controversial sentiment. If you replace "white" with any other racial term, there would have been no controversy. People would have celebrated it.
But people put up fliers saying that it's OK to be white, and general public outrage ensued.
Because in our society, it's NOT OK to be white.
Our multiracial society (and by that, I mean the West in general) is a failure.
We need a white ethnostate.
The SJWs and the ethnic minorities need to leave.
You still celebrated the fact that I got censored for saying things that, while controversial and probably offensive, are not inherently objectionable from a liberal perspective. You understand why that's not a good thing, yes?
At any rate, I removed the rosary signature because I didn't want people reading my political commentary and associating it with my religious views.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Oh yes. Any time I don't have to read your rambling wreck of racist dreck it's a great day.
You understand that you don't understand you're being objectionable, yes?
Fascinating. Any reason why you'd have a problem with anyone associating the two?
If you don't want to read my comments, you understand that there is an ignore feature, yes?
Essentially, what you've said is: "I don't like you've said SO MUCH that I think that institutional power should be used to prevent you from saying it."
I guarantee you that this is not a rabbit hole that you want to go down.
If you can cite something in particular that I've said which you think is inherently objectionable on liberal grounds, then I invite you to do so.
But I suspect that you won't, because you can't. Because "That's offensive" or "I disagree" does not constitute "inherently objectionable."
Optics are important.
lain:Traditio is apparently under the impression that bigotry consists only of the use of ethnic slurs. That as long as one says "Afro-American", and not "******" [edit: the site automatically censored the "n-word", showing that the site is unaware of context. Traditio doesn't have that excuse] - you are not officially a bigot. That if you use the word "Jew" and not "Kike", then you are not an anti-semite.
I've never made any such claims. What I do claim, however, is that bigoted opinions must be permissible in a liberal society.
If you want to censor someone for directly insulting someone by calling him the n-word, OK, fair enough.
But for expressing views critical of black people?
No. That's simply not acceptable.
In a liberal society, people have a right to be racist.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Absolutely. I also understand there's a ban feature.
If the rules of a privately-owned site forbid posting racist material in whatever form and you break the rules by posting racist material in whatever form then if you get banned you shouldn't be surprised.
Oh, there's so much that's objectionable, Trad. It's sad you can't see it.
Optics are important.
Translation: your racist views don't mesh with your religion, in fact would be considered non-doctrinal; therefore the religion goes in the closet while you're transmitting racist material.
Such a non-response. You are essentially just saying "yay" and "boo."
Do,however, remember this in the event that the TOL administrative staff should become less hospitable to your views.
Tell me what you think about gay wedding cakes and Christian bakers.
Then providing individual examples accompanied by clear, articulable explanations should be easy!
Just remember, though: "That's offensive" and "I disagree" are not permissible. Because in a liberal society, I don't have to care about your feelings.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
:chuckle: I've been banned at least 6 times. I didn't come back and complain about it.
Amazing how you think you're the only person in the world who knows how to put words together, but I'll humor you:
Somehow I doubt you're bearing any crosses over your professed racism.
- Status