musterion
Well-known member
He knows that already and it isn't a "mistake" on his part to say what he does, sadly enough.
#3
He knows that already and it isn't a "mistake" on his part to say what he does, sadly enough.
With that said, do not make the tragic mistake that liberals agree with this ruling. That is not the case.
You didn't and that's good. I just want to make sure this doesn't turn into a political argument because this case has nothing to do with politics. It has to do with two judges who should never be allowed to enter a court room again and a terrible individual who abused a child.Where did I say they all would?
Ad hominem #2.
Nope, you do or at least should know that the majority of people from either 'side' on the political spectrum would condemn any such decision.
#4 and a bonus straw man thrown in.
Take the night off, champ.
Argumentum ad populum.
Straw men seem to be your forte this evening, else justify how you think that "leftists" would be any more partial to this ruling than conservatives.
No, an argument based on reality and common sense.
Red herring. I made no such claim, as even Quisp was fair enough to acknowledge.
Are you impaired this evening?
Another red herring dodge. You appealed to majority, only one of which you even belong to.
Quoth JohnW, "Stay on the mat."
Stay down, Artie.
Well, what I actually was pointing out is there is a parallel between children age 3-6 being encouraged to choose a gender identity (I've read more than I wanted to on that subject) and the view that a 6 year old could also make a sexual choice. It's logically cohesive and coherent. It is an unusual judgement in our times, but it does seem consistent with that other trend.....Well there may be some cranks out there who identify as liberals/leftists or whatever that say such but to say it's typical of the "left" is just sheer garbage. If this story's legit then the judges want sacking at the very least. Morons.
Well, what I actually was pointing out is there is a parallel between children age 3-6 being encouraged to choose a gender identity (I've read more than I wanted to on that subject) and the view that a 6 year old could also make a sexual choice. It's logically cohesive and coherent. It is an unusual judgement in our times, but it does seem consistent with that other trend.....
I'm surprised they admitted it's a choice, and a result of the molestation. Most leftists claim the people were born that way.
Good catch. Either sexual orientation is a fluid, fluctuating spectrum, or it's unalterably fixed at birth.
Which is it?
Answer: whichever one gets the most kids out of their pants.