Judges reduce sentence of sodomite child rapist. Guess why.

musterion

Well-known member
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/w...e-reduction-to-abuser-of-6-year-old.html?_r=3

Two Argentine judges are under fire for reducing the sentence of a convicted child abuser on the grounds that his 6-year-old victim had suffered earlier abuse and therefore had already been traumatized. In the newly publicized 2014 ruling, the judges cut the sentence of Mario Tolosa, a sports club vice president, from six years to 38 months. They ruled that his acts should not be considered “gravely outrageous” in legal terms because the boy already “was making a precocious choice” of his sexuality, apparently a reference to homosexuality. One of the judges, Horacio Piombo, defended the ruling in interviews on Monday, saying that before Mr. Tolosa molested the boy, the child had already suffered “the initiation by his father into the worst of worlds, leading him to depravation.” The judge said that as a result of that experience, the boy had showed “signs of a transvestite conduct, of conduct we had to take into account.”
Hey, don't be mad at me, I'm just reporting the news. It's from the leftist NYT, so you know it's got to be true and newsworthy.
 

GFR7

New member

musterion

Well-known member
No doubt the judges are leftists if not closet pedo-homos (a redundancy, historically speaking).
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Unbelievable that the judge would refer to a 6 year old as having made "a precocious choice" of his sexuality. On the other hand, aren't leftist telling toddlers they can make sexual choices? It all comes back on them............

Well there may be some cranks out there who identify as liberals/leftists or whatever that say such but to say it's typical of the "left" is just sheer garbage. If this story's legit then the judges want sacking at the very least. Morons.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
No doubt the judges are leftists if not closet pedo-homos (a redundancy, historically speaking).

Yeh, cos there's no such thing as "conservatives" being caught up in the same is there? :rolleyes:

How about instead of trotting out the same tired ole 'leftist' crap you actually get a grip and realize there's loons on any side of the political spectrum?

:idea:
 

Nazaroo

New member
A new precedent which pedophiles/lawyers will use to get lesser sentences
when they molest boys, or any child who has been previously molested.

Pass the ammunition.
 

musterion

Well-known member
A new precedent which pedophiles/lawyers will use to get lesser sentences when they molest boys, or any child who has been previously molested.

Now that some on our SC have begun to cite foreign case law, very probably.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Ah, the good ol' red herring fallacy.

Okay, thanks for proving you're not actually interested in intelligent conversation but merely peddling some tired nonsense about people who happen to be left of centre on the political spectrum. About as accurate as it is original.
 

Nazaroo

New member
enhanced-buzz-wide-17158-1432147612-10.jpg
 

OCTOBER23

New member
In Noah's Time there were about 8 Billion people on Earth

who were OK with PERVERSIONS.

That will be fulfilled in 2024 .
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Know anyone who can offer some?

You're making Shaggy look profound.

I'm not sure you'd be able to recognize it if you're actually silly enough to think that most people on the left would endorse this particular ruling should the article be legit. That would just be asinine if so and it's now you reduced to the 'ad hominem' with your latter, which is rather ironic if not a little amusing in turn...
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
These two judges missed in a big, big way. I hope this comes back to them and this case is re-visited. With that said, do not make the tragic mistake that liberals agree with this ruling. That is not the case.

He knows that already and it isn't a "mistake" on his part to say what he does, sadly enough.
 

musterion

Well-known member
I'm not sure you'd be able to recognize it if you're actually silly enough to think that most people on the left would endorse this particular ruling should the article be legit. That would just be asinine if so and it's now you reduced to the 'ad hominem' with your latter, which is rather ironic if not a little amusing in turn...

Ad hominem #2.
 
Top