CherubRam
New member
What mess of a contradiction of even John chapter one alone. Not to mention the many other chapters throughout the Scripture in light of Romans thru Philemon that show your error.
Your comment is to vague.
What mess of a contradiction of even John chapter one alone. Not to mention the many other chapters throughout the Scripture in light of Romans thru Philemon that show your error.
Malachi 2:10 has to do with Jews dealing with other Jews before the New Covenant.KJV Malachi 2:10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?
NKJ Romans 2:11 For there is no partiality with God.
The New Covenant is for ALL - Adam and Eve and all their descendants. We all died when Christ died and so are "in Him" when He died (see 2 Cor 5:14, 15); when He resurrected, we were made alive together with Him (Eph 2:4-6; Col 2:13). Because of the life, death and resurrection of our Lord, our names were all written in the book of life BUT only overcomers will NOT be blotted out from it (Rev 3:5).
It is Tuesday, and still no Jews or Muslims have come to defend their faith.
Jew after Jew twist what I said. Revoking the covenant: The info comes from the Old Testament, not the new.There is no point in discussing this with you. You have decided, using your "New Testament" sources, that we don't have a covenant. We don't care one whit what it says in your book.
Zechariah 11:10-11 NIV
10 Then I took my staff called Favor and broke it, revoking the covenant I had made with all the nations. 11 It was revoked on that day, and so the oppressed of the flock who were watching me knew it was the word of the Lord.
Thanks for reminding me.It might be useful to read the entire chapter- and the next chapter as well. Try it.
I gave no personal interpretation of an obscure bible verse.Why do you think I should care about your weird interpretation of obscure Biblical verses?
Try Leviticus 26. Note that is talking about what happens after Israel has sinned:
44 Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them. I am the Lord their God. 45 But for their sake I will remember the covenant with their ancestors whom I brought out of Egypt in the sight of the nations to be their God. I am the Lord.’”
I gave no personal interpretation of an obscure bible verse.
...
11 It was revoked on that day, and so the afflicted of the flock who were watching me knew it was the word [Yahshua] of [the Lord / Yahwah.]
The Sadducees were members of a Jewish sect founded in the second century BC, possibly as a political party. They ceased to exist sometime after the first century AD.
Thus the Three Shepherds: Sanhedrin, Sadducees, and Pharisees.
Sure you did. Here:
Oh ish, one word.
the word [Yahshua]
John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with The Only Divine Eternal, and the Word was divine.
Foolish words on your part. I am quoting scriptures, Tanakh included.Again: why should I care what your holy book says.
Earlier you asked why no Jews or Muslims are defending their faiths to your challenge. The basic answer is that your arguments are not worth the bother.
I am posting this on twitter.com, under CherubRam and Christian Forum, to Rabbi's and others. This message will not go unnoticed.
And your words are worthless, all you see is mud. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.Your arguments are extremely weak, and I will not waste further time with them. Your bullying threat to "expose" this on twitter only shows that you yourself know that you have nothing of substance.
I won't be wasting further time on this.
Have a nice day.