You apparently reject Paul's entire ministry.
Quote, please, where we have rejected Scripture.
What does this have to do with anything?
Begging the question is a logical fallacy.
And yet, God is completely willing to take Israel back.
Uh, no, that's not our "response."
Our "response" is that Paul explicitly states, and John elaborates, that Israel WILL IN FACT be taken back by God, at the end of days.
Haven't you ever read the Bible?
Was that not the entire purpose of the Cross? So that no matter how evil someone could become, they could still be redeemed to God?
Yup. And?
The people who killed Jesus are dead and gone, and maybe you forgot what Jesus said when He was on the cross?
"Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."
They didn't realize that they played right into His plan to save the world!
Sounds like it's no longer an issue for God.
The only sin Israel is guilty of currently is rejection of her Messiah.
Once they repent of that, God is more than willing to take her back.
There's even entire books in the Bible about how God longs to take her back!
No, we have never thought that.
They will be saved, when they turn back to God.
That's not "against their will," by definition!
Jesus is THE source of Truth, for He is Truth.
Jesus called Paul. That makes Paul a secondary source of truth, one through which THE Truth is delivered.
The problem with such threads is that they focus on the wrong aspect of Christ's ministry to Israel, trying to apply the things meant specifically for Israel during the Time of Jacob's Trouble (AKA Great Tribulation) to the Body of Christ. Much of the discussion then becomes MADists trying to correct the faulty premises on which the original post was made, which means that Paul's letters are brought up, because if there was no change in dispensation, then there's no need for Paul, and in fact, none of what Paul says makes sense in much of the context of what Jesus taught during His earthly ministry, and it usually continues on that topic for a while, then the thread gets old and dies, or it peters out very quickly.
In order to understand what Jesus said, you need to know the context, and that includes the events surrounding His life, both before and after He died, up to at least 30 years afterwards.
But most people don't, because they haven't been taught those things, and don't have the big picture overview like MADists do.
Do remember that we couldn't bring all the old threads over when we switched to XenForo. A lot of old threads were lost.
That being said...
There are more than enough threads besides yours that do exist that talk about Christ.
Try reading.
As RD has pointed out multiple times to you now:
I do not write these things to shame you, but as my beloved children I warn you. For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel. Therefore I urge you, imitate me.
Paul’s Paternal Care - I do not write these things to shame you, but as my beloved children I warn you. For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel.
www.biblegateway.com
Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. Give no offense, either to the Jews or to the Greeks or to the church of God, just as I also please all men in all things, not seeking my own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved. Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ. Now I praise you, brethren, that you remember me in all things and keep the traditions just as I delivered them to you. But I want you to know that the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. Give no offense, either to the Jews or to the Greeks or to the church of God, just as I also please all men in all things, not seeking my own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved. Worship and...
www.biblegateway.com
Who's the one really rejecting scripture here, Gary?
Why do you assume we don't?
Why do you think there haven't been?
To me, posting a thread praising Christ seems rather... self-serving.
By that, I mean, "Hey, look at me! I'm praising Christ! I must be a really good Christian! Give me likes!"
I think what RD said above suffices here: So you don't know what we believe, yet you criticise it for being wrong?
How does that make any sense?
So what?
If that was anything but a complete compliment, you're a hypocrite.