Pepper, sorry I hadn't seen your response... fast moving thread.
So what is right and wrong is based on your personal preferences? Is that what you're saying? (I would assume you're being sarcastic to avoid giving a serious answer, but I've seen people state such things before and mean it.)Pepper said:No it's not only wrong because it's illegal, it's wrong because there are way more people out there that I don't want to see naked than the ones that I do want to see naked.
Yeah it would still be wrong because there would still be people I don't want to see naked.
Yes please leave the law in tact!!!!! It would be tragic if I had to see certain people naked, I would have to claw out my own eyes.
...Unless you don't like it, assuming your above responses were honest.No, it shouldn't be done away with because of that. But a woman should still be able to dress however she would like.
Who said it was appropriate for men to dress that way?If men can walk around in speedos or tight shorts and no shirts...
Am I to conclude from this question that you don't count anything above the waist among the "important parts" that a woman ought to keep covered in public? (If so, then perhaps you do favor changing the current laws after all.)...why can't a woman?