I'm going to ask a question at the end of this post that I'd like you to answer even if you don't address any other part of the post. That question is: Even if you believe the MSM, can you at least realize that those that don't believe the MSM are being completely reasonable?
Now on to the post wherein I admit I was wrong:
So, you are quite right that saying there are no excess deaths is wrong, but I'm using the statement as hyperbole to discuss the details. My guess is that you are too smart to get drawn into a discussion about the details because you'd rather believe the lie. Lies like Sweden being devastated by COVID when their death rates were only a little worse in the April and are much better than everyone else this Winter sick season, lies like masks work when we can't see any correlation between mask mandates and case data over time, lies like lockdowns work when people in locked down areas like NY are arguably dying faster than open places, lies like the vaccine is vital when the disease has a trajectory similar to any other flu in areas where the vaccine is minimal at best, and lies like we know for sure that asymptomatic spread is the driver of this disease when that is highly questionable and doesn't fit with intuition or overall trends.
Even if you believe the MSM, can you at least realize that those that don't believe the MSM are being completely reasonable? Can you go that far?
Now on to the post wherein I admit I was wrong:
That's not the argument. The argument is that the papers do not show that a host of treatments denigrated by the MSM, which you are agreeing with in this thread, don't work. The argument is questioning you as to why you still believe the MSM about these papers? Especially with their track record of lying and failure?What type of an argument is this? Because I read the papers and understand that some of these treatments are not effective- I am against finding treatment?
As I previously said, the devil is in the details. You'll notice they don't list the 15-64 deaths in the US. That isn't because the data isn't available, but because it shows a statistically significant bump in the graph for that age-group. Why, when that age group was far below the death rate for the flu? When a lot of young people die because of non-COVID causes is there a corresponding death rate increase in the aged and feeble? There typically is - in fact the typical rate of increase of the aged when excess young people are dying is similar to what we see in April 2020. So we know excess people are dying, but it isn't from COVID.Nonsense- this is just a more sophisticated way of calling me a 'retard'. I know that there has been great progress made in treatment, as one would hope and expect over time, and I am glad of it, as I am glad for the vaccine.
The bias is in those who insist, against all evidence, that the pandemic is fake, that the medical community are fools or tools of somebody evil.
You keep repeating that there are no excess deaths- you posted something about that a while ago- I don't recall where. There are numbers.
Excess mortality during the Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19)
Excess mortality is a term used in epidemiology and public health that refers to the number of deaths from all causes during a crisis above and beyond what we would have expected to see under ‘normal’ conditions.1 In this case, we’re interested in how the number of deaths during the COVID-19...ourworldindata.org
So, you are quite right that saying there are no excess deaths is wrong, but I'm using the statement as hyperbole to discuss the details. My guess is that you are too smart to get drawn into a discussion about the details because you'd rather believe the lie. Lies like Sweden being devastated by COVID when their death rates were only a little worse in the April and are much better than everyone else this Winter sick season, lies like masks work when we can't see any correlation between mask mandates and case data over time, lies like lockdowns work when people in locked down areas like NY are arguably dying faster than open places, lies like the vaccine is vital when the disease has a trajectory similar to any other flu in areas where the vaccine is minimal at best, and lies like we know for sure that asymptomatic spread is the driver of this disease when that is highly questionable and doesn't fit with intuition or overall trends.
Even if you believe the MSM, can you at least realize that those that don't believe the MSM are being completely reasonable? Can you go that far?
Last edited: