yes
do you know the republicans do not have enough votes to override a veto?
do you know why?
It's despicable when Rs speak against other Rs
- Thread starter republicanchick
- Start date
yes
do you know the republicans do not have enough votes to override a veto?
do you know why?
Sitamun
New member
I mean god forbid the republicans even TRY working with democrats to swing some votes right? I mean why should they attempt talking to them. Until the Republicans actually try some bi partisanship, their whine filled cries of "unfair" will be scoffed at... at least by me and many other "liberals".
so you blame the republicans because the democrats won't vote to override a veto?
did you blame the republicans when reid block legislation?
I expected nothing less...did you expect him to cave like the RINO's are on the unlawful immigration edict? Heck your boy Jeb wants this amnesty deal as much as Obama though he attempts to play it off as he doesn't.
Now this post is funny :rotfl: are you attempting to assert that the Reid Senate, and Pelosi House were bi-partisan? Really? So now the shoe is on the other foot and you expect the Repubs to be any less partisan when they are in power of both houses? after having these two turds ramming legislation down the throats of all Americans, and creating gridlock for the past 6 years. The only people that need a good dose of bi-partisanship is Democrats and their King Obama. Your post is funny, it gave me a good laugh when I read it.
do you think romney would have vetoed the pipeline?
I don't think he ever had a snowball's chance in hell of ever being elected to do so. He was a worthless unelectable candidate just like Jeb Bush is and any other Progressive RINO is. Until you & the RNC realize that the RINO chosen are unelectable they will continue to lose the Oval Office. I know you deny there is a schism in the republican party but, outside of a real conservative getting the nomination they will lose again, I would bet your paycheck on it...:chuckle:
so you are not going to answer the question?
but
you knew obama would
so
why wouldn't you vote for romney just because of that?
Sitamun
New member
You missed a part of what I said. The republicans wanted to over ride the veto, they KNEW Obama was gonna veto, so it was no surprise when he did. The republicans KNEW what they needed. Now either, they didn't make the attempt, or their attempts didn't work to swing votes in their favor. This works both ways. You brought up the pipeline so that is what I used. To be honest when congress passes a bill I like I'm fine, if they are attempting to shut down legislation I don't like, I don't care. I'm being honest here. Yes, I have blamed democrats for not doing enough at times as well.
they did it because people like you don't know
or
won't admit that there is a difference
and
you still don't see it
or
maybe you are not being honest
You never asked me if I voted for Romney chrys, you asked if I thought he would veto the pipeline. I am telling you it is an asinine question because he was not elected, and never had a chance to be elected. My point is that if the RINO's continue to bankroll crappy candidates you never will have a republican in the oval office to put forward a project like keystone.
did you vote for romney?
I voted against him in the primary that I will tell you.
Who I voted for in the general is really none of your business but, I can tell you this though it would not have mattered anyway because republican votes don't mean squat in California in the general the delegates always go blue.
Your reply here shows the wisdom embedded in my example. It is open and general enough to plug in whatever you want.
Progressives tore down the barriers of discrimination, while conservatives made sure the line between small business and the corporations stayed put.
When biblical prophecy says something like "the Lion shall lie down by the Lamb" it is a free form metaphor that can be used by anyone from either political stripe. It decidedly speaks "truth."
So I am a "progressive liberal." That's certainly news to my wife who considers herself one.
The federalist papers are still an instructive read. They go behind the scenes to reveal the process of bringing together an effective government from the 13 colonies.
So this vague statement below is related to the federalist papers? I don't think I or anyone else would have extrapolated it from your statement.
Really I don't care what you or others think chrys, if you believe I voted for Obama you would be wrong but, if you want to spread that lie feel free it makes no difference to me.
Probably none at all, I just don't want to tell you because it irritates you when I stonewall about it. :chuckle:
republicanchick
New member
if u had said this in '12 I would've believed it, but... so much has happened since then
Benghazi
IRS scandal
VA scandal..
of course, the pres had nothing to do with any of that... not a smidgeon of corruption --or any other nefarious thing... but anyhow...
even biggr than that
the election of 2014
It tells us something...
biggest R takeover of Congress since 1929
1929..
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
!
:cheers: