A lion wants a bigger dinner, while a fox makes well with roast rabbit
Isn't it reasonable to doubt Young Earth Creationism?
- Thread starter Vulcan Logician
- Start date
A lion wants a bigger dinner, while a fox makes well with roast rabbit
iouae
Well-known member
Yes, Brer Rabbit is too nimble for a lion to catch, and if a lion wasted its energy trying to catch it, it would waste more energy than is in the rabbit.
All food chains have one or two balanced predator-prey relationships.
It would be impossible for all the animals which have ever lived to have lived simultaneously. Imagine the chaos of dinosaurs with humans etc. God had to make beasts much smaller and cuddlier to suit us weak humans, or we would be the prey for everything.
Water that is over 500 degrees above the boiling point flashes to steam when released. There is a huge amount of energy in that high temperature water that is released. You need the steam as part of your hypothesis so that it can condense and fall as rain. There is a substantial amount of energy stored in superheated fluids and the law of conservation of energy applies. I have not yet seen the math that would support a fountain that could cool super critical water while retaining enough energy to launch large chunks of the Earth's surface into varying orbits. I'm not even sure why that is part of Walt's hypothesis.
6days
New member
Chaos? Perhaps according to secular beliefs.iouae said:
God's Word tell us... "God created great sea creatures and every living thing that scurries and swarms in the water, and every sort of bird...And evening passed and morning came, marking the fifth day. ...God made all sorts of wild animals, livestock, and small animals...God created human beings in his own image... Then God blessed them and said...Fill the earth and govern it. Reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the animals that scurry along the ground....And evening passed and morning came, marking the sixth day."
iouae
Well-known member
No, according to logic and Jurassic Park 1-3.
You just got finished describing how that doesn't happen.
Enough to launch Pluto.
Nope.
That's not surprising. You spend no time considering the arguments of others.
:yawn:
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Cabinetmaker: What happens if you have SCW in a 4 gallon container and open a 1/2-inch hole in it? Assume the container does not fail.
Does it "flash to steam"?
Is the discharge hot or cold?
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Does it "flash to steam"?
Is the discharge hot or cold?
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
What part of "assume the container does not fail" do you not understand?
The part where that is a reasonable assumption.
Except his focus isn't the container. It's the fluid inside he wants to know about. It's a hypothetical question, Cabbie, his focus is on the fluid inside the container, not the container itself. He's wanting to know if you know how SCW behaves.
This isn't even super critical water.
Here is some super heated water.
Hey, Cabbie, the topic is Supercritical water, not steam or liquid water.
The water and the container form a system that have to be taken together. A breach in a pressure vessel can easly lead to a steam explosion. If the vessel that holds the water manages to retain its integrity then the water that exits the hole will instantly flash to super heated steam. Look at the Myth Buster video. That was just super heated water and when it was disturbed, it instantly boiled. This happened to my Mom and the water that came out of that cup burned her hand. The thin wall of a plastic bucket does not create a throttling valve capable of reducing the temperature of the water from 705°F to 40°F in the time it takes the high pressure water to traverse the distance defined by the wall of the bucket. A throttling valve is a actually a fairly complex design when dealing with super critical liquids. It is not just a hole.
What are the properties of supercritical water? It is very hot and it is under a lot of pressure. What happens when you suddenly reduce the pressure by punching a hole in something. See the law of conservation of energy.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, that would be you. He's just given you a detailed explanation and this is the lame sorta crap he gets as "response".
You're a joke.
It's Stripe, you expect something different?
