If I was trying to derail the thread it should be easy enough to quote me doing it.
Ok, Here you go:
The theories in your link as well as the ones that are discussed in the link I provided are all based on a belief in the Copernican model having outer space.
what's keeping the gases here for us to breathe?
According to the theory of relativity gravity has zero force.
Due to experiments that show Newtons 3rd law of motion that relies on gravity is false, you have no other choice than to believe Einstein or come up with your own solution, which by default cannot be gravity.
Newtonian gravity was debunked over 100 years ago.
I don't need a strawman.
I used to believe in all that pseudoscience myself.
All experiments showed the earth to be stationary.
That killed Newton's theory that required gravity to make things move.
I'm with you.
Einstein had to get things moving again. ( protect the heliocentric model)
He did it by saying objects at rest are accelerating as well as warping space and time.
Purdy stupid right?
Yep but it's the only alternative that's been put forth in the last 100 years.
Except for us dimwits who believe God when he says the earth is fixed. (geocentric)
Since certain things don't move, gravity is debunked.
Your position is a spinning flying ball in the heliocentric model.
Problem is that you don't know it as well as I do.
Hence you call it a strawman.
Earth.
What part of the earth doesn't move makes you think you can still have attraction?
You do it every time you make a statement about gravity that's been proven defunct.
All of these are arguments from your belief that the earth is geocentric, a belief that was disproven centuries ago simply by observing the movements of the planets.
And we all know you're a flat-earther, so it's not surprising that you'd make such arguments.