Is the Pope as he claims “God on Earth”.

[Leatherneck]

John 14:6 tells mankind who to depend on and it isn’t a pope or Mary.

 

[Idolater]

First, there is no evidence.

There is no evidence that is inconsistent with the Assumption of Mary. Check.

Second, why did they wait for over 1900 years to declare this supposed "historical event"?

What exactly do you mean by "declare". Because it's not as if the first record of it is in the 1800s.

 

[Right Divider]

There is no evidence that is inconsistent with the Assumption of Mary. Check.

Childish and stupid of you, but I can see why.

What exactly do you mean by "declare". Because it's not as if the first record of it is in the 1800s.

The actual event supposedly occurred nearly 2000 years ago and YET your "church" waited all that time to formally "dogmatically define" (is that better, since you cannot understand what I meant by "declare") this doctrine. You cannot see that there is something wrong with that?

 

[Idolater]

Childish and stupid of you, but I can see why.

Plain.

The actual event supposedly occurred nearly 2000 years ago and YET your "church" waited all that time to formally "dogmatically define" (is that better, since you cannot understand what I meant by "declare")

It is.

this doctrine. You cannot see that there is something wrong with that?

No.