Only in your dreams, sonny boy.
Then kindly, bible corrector/mystic/agnostic, if provide me the verses that require I answer any/all questions posed, as you ask every member on TOL, in deceit, especially from bible correctors/mystics/agnostics, such as yourself, as I've asked you for over 3 years.
You have not, and will not, as you know I will pick you apart, bible corrector/mystic/agnostic.
As I predicted-you will not.
I am still waiting for you to tell me why anyone should believe that people are created with corrupt bodies since the Scriptures tell us that the Lord Jesus was made like His brethren "in all things."
johnny boy will believe the Bible ONLY if the words "in all things" mean the same thing as the words "in some things."
Real tough guy, are you weak old man, with that "johnny boy" comment. Feel better about your manhood, do you old man? I've seen "pics" of you, on a few sites, from which you've been banned, and it is quite comical in your "johhny boy" comment, as you look quite the sissy, with no hair, and a weak/no chin, weasel, frail looking appearance-quite the "gay, happy" type, aren't you? Try working out to improve your quite wimpy, Wally Cox appearance, Mr. Peepers, Jr.
Jerry's admission, again, that he is not a bible believer,once again is demonstrated, i.e., his doctrine determines what the bible should say; if it does not, he either:
-corrects a particular version, usually the KJB, or..
-finds another version, or stack of versions, that say what will "prove" his doctrine, or...
-deletes/add words to versions, usually from his stack of alleged "scholars."
Jerry S:Here is an error filled version, and I will compare it, with a mess of other error filled versions, to come up with perfection.
It's called anti-thinking.
Thus, he is not a bible believer, as correcting any "the bible" presupposes an authority over it, as he rejects the scripture's testimony that it is to correct him, he is not to correct bit, he rejects that he is to submit to the very words, not submit the book to his correction, to make it support/validate/agree with what he believes, and, he rejects the command that, if he does not "get" a particular verse/passage, it is he who is wrong, that needs correction, not the book, as the LORD God deserves "the benefit of the doubt," it is he, the bihble corrector, that is to go back, and survey the book, meditate on it, study it, until he "gets it." But leave the book alone. This is consistent with his humanism approach, that the lost/atheists employ, i.e., I do not understand how God could use fallible human beings, to initially provide His objective words(which, by definition, are w/o error), and subsequently preserve them, w/o error. So, he did not. (fill in the blank with the concept of hell, raising the dead..............)
This is how bible correctors, like this used car salesman Jerry S, "operate," to "prove" anything they want.That is his MO, 'shtick" on TOL.
I apologize to all of TOL for, once again, engaging this bible corrector Jerry S.,in debates, as I forgot his tactics, and let my better judgment to ignore this poser, "back seat" to my thinking that he could be persuaded. I was wrong. Bible correctors, like Jerry S., cannot be corrected, as they are "experts" on correcting the LORD God, as revealed in His book, a quite uncorrectable book/LORD God, by the tactics I explained above, and any attempts to teach them, in their "unteachable spirit," is akin to rearranging the deck chairs, on the SS Titanic.
Slower-reread my post:
I do not debate bible correctors/mystics/agnostics, old man; I only attempt to persuade, dispute with bible believers.That excludes you. Dig? Which word did you not understand?
You'll probably correct my post. Have at it, bible corrector.
Have at it, old man, have fun correcting the book, as you can "prove" anything.
