Is marital rape scripturally defensible?
Feminized men. You have shown that you only like men who support your bias, which always puts women at the advantage- with excuses and indifference wherever it's ugly face is clearly shown.
So says the woman thanking every post of any subject whatsoever she passes on this site which goes against me :chuckle:
Crucible,
I answered yes as yes and no as no.
I found common ground here, but to worry about this past the idea that rape is bad of any kind, and radical feminism is bad, will only incite a cyclic argument that has been rehearsed.
The origin of feminism was sufferage. As in Suffragettes.
However some flavors of feminism seek to undermine gender roles, and in this, there is no argument. A man is a man and a woman is a woman. Now what happens from there is subject to free will, but the scientific concrete has dried long ago.
There are biological facts that cannot be bent.
Men are indeed different than women and their roles differ because of this.
This topic is sad to exist because a follower of our servant King must have suggested it was ok to rape maritally.
But more likely, it was a Muslim or religious extremist who doesn't understand Christ's commission to love and respect whenever possible, and most improbable.
This topic is typically brought up because a women has experienced terrible things, or has been close to a women that has experienced terrible things.
In that light it is good.
If however it had been brought up to demonize men, a form of sexism, then it would have been bad.
In this light, it seems the author of this thread was concerned about the simple evil of rape.
To fully lock horns with any idea that a man is not a man and a woman is not a woman would be futile.
Also, to believe any good can come from arguing the case against feminism is futile.
Every person knows their own heart, and you will know well the heart by the hearts willingness to respect or disrespect opinion.
Um.... Hidden message in this post.