ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
is he still making that claim? :darwinsm:
Is marital rape scripturally defensible?
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
- Status
is he still making that claim? :darwinsm:
You still running from the permaban wager on it like Jesse Owens at the starting gun?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
You still running from the permaban wager on it like Jesse Owens at the starting gun?
we've hashed this out before - there's nothing you could provide as proof that's open source that i couldn't match to "prove" that i am too
remember when you posted a pic of yourself holding "your" law license?
took me five seconds to find the same thing from the NY bar on google :chuckle:
That's not true and we both know it. Knight could easily verify it. AMR already has.
I never did that. As with so much, your memory is fuzzy. I once posted a photo of my framed certificate to practice before the S. Ct.
Also not true. And you didn't reproduce the credential I posted for friends, not proof. Again, I can absolutely prove without equivocation that I am and have been for some time a lawyer in good standing before the bar.
What you did, when AMR stepped up and I made the thing serious was declare that you didn't care if I was, that you didn't say I wasn't and blather like that.
Run, Jesse.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
of course it is
there's nothing you could provide to me that's verifiable on the internet that I couldn't match
so make your bet with knight :idunno:
so make your bet with amr :idunno:
you mean one of these, with your name fuzzed out?
That's a lie, of course.
You can't reproduce a S.Ct. certification from this state on the internet. But I suppose it's moot. You couldn't be trusted to honor your word at any rate and we both know Knight's not going to police your bargain.
Run along, Jesse. We both know what you're made of.
Someone's jealousy, envy and sour grapes is showing! You are unable to grant any good to someone whom you know is a better man than you? By better I mean a man of integrity and decency who doesn't resort to hitting below the belt as you do.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
bybee - you're a tiresome meddlesome old bat who lacks any particle of relevancy
just go away
He's reinventing the past now. I suppose all the pruning makes him comfortable with it...but if you go through effort he'll just do what he did then, which was to declare he really didn't care or didn't even say I wasn't and on and on...he's still trying to find the goat to get. But he stopped being that sort of trouble a long time ago.
Hope you're faring well and not taking him too seriously. :cheers:
I never did. You ran. The challenge has always and still remains. If Knight wants to put his word in and you're perma banned when the credentials are verified, any day you like.
I could have any number of attorneys or the bar itself validate the claim.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
that's your claim?
are you willing to stand behind it or are you just blowing hot air?
I never did. You ran. The challenge has always and still remains. If Knight wants to put his word in and you're perma banned when the credentials are verified, any day you like.
I could have any number of attorneys or the bar itself validate the claim.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
that's your claim?
are you willing to stand behind it or are you just blowing hot air?
Why are you repeating a post I just answered?
Again: The challenge remains. If Knight wants to put his word in and you're perma banned in any present, past and future incarnation, if you're then literally done here and he'll enforce that when the credentials are verified should you at any time attempt to circumvent your pledge, any day you like.
I could have any number of attorneys or the bar itself validate the claim.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Why are you repeating a post I just answered?
Again: The challenge has always and still remains. If Knight wants to put his word in and you're perma banned when the credentials are verified, any day you like.
i'm not interested in knight, or "any number of attorneys or the bar itself"
this is between me and you
are you willing to stand behind what you said, or are you going to chicken out like last time?
Such an unappealing shade of green ...
There is no me and you. There's just your specious claim and lack of backbone against a certain truth and your loss of this forum to vent. You're not interested in proof because you lose. And I suppose you've done enough of that for a lifetime.
I never moved from the challenge. You ran. You declared you didn't care when I made the challenge conditional to your permanent banning.
Oh well, you know the old saying "If you can't beat em in debate, try to get em banned".
For some, another person's intelligence makes them value their self-worth.
- Status